London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs Balance Global

Side-by-side comparison from 353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 1/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
Balance Global: wins 0/7 categories
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA): wins 6/7 categories
Reception Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.74
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.75
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.60
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.56
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.50
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
4.32
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
  • +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
  • +Strong professional development and career opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
75%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
44%
25%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

CIMA-My Dream

It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close