Federation University Australia - FedUni vs Torrens University Australia vs Monash University vs University of New England vs Roffey Park Institute
Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Approachable professors and personalized attention
- +Practical, challenging, and engaging coursework
- +Supportive learning environment with smaller class sizes
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty
- +Excellent facilities and modern campus environment
- +Diverse community and valuable personal development opportunities
- +Flexible and accessible online learning options
- +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Supportive student services and community focus
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create a poor learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Lack of practical, industry-relevant learning and underwhelming course content.
- -Insufficient career opportunities and support services.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a near-perfect 4.8. Facilities and Accomodation also score well at 4.6. The weakest area identified is Value, which received a rating of 4.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
Remarkably high marks were achieved in several areas, with Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48) standing out as the strongest aspects. Facilities also scored well at 4.35. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the lowest-rated category at 3.74. The university also received solid scores for Student Life (4.16), Location (4.08), and Value (4.25), indicating a generally positive, though not uniformly exceptional, student experience.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Students highlight rewarding academic journeys, supportive learning environments, personalized attention from approachable professors, modern facilities, and challenging yet practical content.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
The university garners high praise, with ~96% positive reviews. Students highlight knowledgeable faculty, modern facilities, and diverse programs. A small percentage (~3.4%) mentioned concerns about cost-cutting and less practical learning experiences.
With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
