Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Hotelschool The Hague vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Business School Netherlands
Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Diverse and international student environment
- +Balanced theory and practical application in programmes
- +Strong hospitality and business programs
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development
- +Diverse and inclusive community
- +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
- +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Holistic learning approach
- +Positive overall experience
- +Strong recommendation
- +Industry-relevant teaching and hands-on experience
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities
- +Strong friendships formed
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and confusion.
- -Lack of support and flexibility during personal emergencies is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent policies and unfair treatment are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment that hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.46. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.31, alongside a positive showing for Location and Value. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.15.
The university presents a mixed but generally positive review. Facilities stand out as its strongest area, earning a notable 3.67. Areas like Professors, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3. Conversely, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all scored a comparable 3.33. While facilities are a definite highlight, teaching quality and on-campus experience appear to be areas for potential improvement.
Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution receives top marks in key areas, including its professors, international outlook, and overall value. Conversely, it scores zero in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation. These extreme ratings suggest a university that excels in academic and global aspects, but has significant shortcomings in its physical campus and student experience offerings.
With exceptional scores in nearly every aspect, this institution shines brightly. Areas of strength are overwhelmingly positive, with perfect ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The primary area for potential improvement lies in Accomodation, which received a more moderate score.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
With a high average rating of 4.3/5 from 56 reviews, ~89% of students praise the university's multicultural environment, excellent library resources, and dedicated professors. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
About 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong personal development and professional industry insights. The remaining 33% of feedback mentions issues with fairness and accountability.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the learning experience and highly recommend the university.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This feedback highlights first-class teaching, facilities, and opportunities, with modules taught by industry leaders providing real-life experience.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
