Global Business University - Europe - GBU vs Cyprus International Institute of Management vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs The American College of Cyprus vs Ctl Eurocollege
Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful and supportive staff
- +Flexible and accessible education
- +Relevant and practical learning
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
- +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
- +Well-organized courses with ample resources
- +Vibrant community and engaging living environment
- +Frequent and enjoyable campus events and activities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
Nothing to show
- -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
- -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
- -Platform not consistently updated.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
- -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality frustrates students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving strong scores around 4.67. Professors also earned a high mark of 4.67. The university's Facilities and Location received solid ratings of 4, while Accomodation scored slightly higher at 4.33. The weakest area, relative to its highest scores, appears to be Facilities and Location.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with particular excellence in Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and Professors are also well-regarded at 4. Value for money is rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.5, though still meeting a reasonable standard.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
With a 4.67 average rating from three reviews, students highly recommend the university, citing helpful staff and flexible programs. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.
With an average rating of 4/5, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a vibrant community with frequent events and seasonal celebrations, making it an engaging and recommendable living environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
I previously studied for an undergraduate degree with The Cyprus Institute of Marketing (BVI) through a local center in Uganda – Center for International Studies. I then decided to continue my studies in 2017 with a graduate degree and opted to do the MSc in Fraud Auditing
Nothing to show
UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
