ESCP Business School vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs WSB University - WSB vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
ESCP Business School: wins 1/7 categories
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 0/7 categories
Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 6/7 categories
Collegium Civitas: wins 0/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.07
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.67
Not rated
4.56
5.00
Win
4.71
Not rated
Professors
4.11
4.30
Not rated
4.11
5.00
Win
4.21
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.04
Not rated
4.44
4.50
4.36
Not rated
Student life
4.17
4.11
Not rated
3.63
4.50
Win
3.93
Not rated
Value
4.39
4.15
Not rated
4.11
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.27
3.58
Not rated
3.56
4.50
Win
3.36
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
  • +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
  • +High-quality teaching and respected professors
  • +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
  • +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
  • +Practical focus and internship opportunities
  • +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
  • +Welcoming environment and competent staff
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
  • -Lack of support and usability from online systems
  • -Overbearing control over student organizations
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.

Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.

This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
55%
41%
50%
22%
100%
57%
0%
4★
38%
52%
50%
56%
0%
29%
0%
3★
5%
4%
0%
22%
0%
7%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

Very good

I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close