University of Warsaw - UW vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs WSB University - WSB vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Civitas

Side-by-side comparison from 202 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kozminski University (4.60)
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 1/7 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 1/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Kozminski University: wins 4/7 categories
Collegium Civitas: wins 1/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Warsaw, Poland
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
54 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.25
3.90
4.51
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.37
2.75
4.50
4.08
4.71
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.46
4.50
4.10
4.57
Win
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.39
4.25
4.20
4.57
Win
4.36
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.23
4.50
Win
3.56
4.48
3.93
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.46
4.25
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.23
Win
4.00
3.50
4.16
3.36
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Rich academic programs and engaging, career-focused curriculum
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive, affordable city location
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Practical and flexible study formats
  • +Supportive and competent staff
  • +Emphasis on internships and career prospects
  • +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
  • +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Underdeveloped curriculum with irrelevant and unhelpful courses.
  • -Limited course offerings and poor access to information.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of practical application and career support
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experience metrics reveal a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both scoring 4.46. Location and internationality also received very favorable scores. Facilities represent the area with the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.19. Student life and accommodation are rated similarly and comfortably above average.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

Considerably strong performance in several key areas, this university excels in its **Location** (4.5) and **Internationality** (4.2). **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.1. Areas requiring attention include **Student Life** (3.55) and **Accomodation** (3.5), which are the weakest aspects according to the provided ratings. **Facilities** and **Value** sit comfortably in the middle with scores of 3.9 and 4 respectively.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Warsaw receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99.1%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise strong academics, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single review mentioned an underdeveloped course with irrelevant material.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.9/5, students praise practical learning, flexible schedules, and welcoming environments. Some note minor issues with certain lecturers' English and building locations.

Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
45%
33%
20%
65%
57%
0%
0%
4★
44%
50%
50%
31%
29%
0%
0%
3★
10%
17%
30%
4%
7%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close