Near East University - NEU vs Girne American University - GAU vs Global Business University - Europe - GBU vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs Cyprus Institute of Marketing

Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Global Business University - Europe - GBU (4.70)
Near East University - NEU: wins 0/7 categories
Girne American University - GAU: wins 0/7 categories
Global Business University - Europe - GBU: wins 6/7 categories
University of Nicosia - UNIC: wins 1/7 categories
Cyprus Institute of Marketing: wins 0/7 categories
Final International University - FIU: wins 0/7 categories
UCLan Cyprus: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics
Best programme: Forensic Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Business Administration
Larnaka, Cyprus
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: BS International Hospitality and Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.59
3.13
4.00
Win
3.92
1.00
3.43
3.50
Location
3.29
3.50
4.00
4.13
Win
1.00
3.86
2.50
Professors
3.63
4.11
4.67
Win
4.24
1.00
3.86
4.00
Internationality
3.68
3.89
4.67
Win
4.21
1.00
3.50
2.50
Student life
2.89
3.11
4.67
Win
3.80
1.00
3.21
2.50
Value
3.37
3.56
4.67
Win
4.14
1.00
3.64
4.00
Accommodation
2.67
2.67
4.33
Win
4.13
1.00
3.07
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and multicultural student body
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and engaging teaching methods
  • +Modern campus with extensive facilities and amenities
  • +Supportive and guiding teachers
  • +Encouraging and inspiring environment
  • +Excellent resources and student life support
  • +Helpful and supportive staff
  • +Flexible and accessible education
  • +Relevant and practical learning
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
  • +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
  • +Well-organized courses with ample resources
  • +Engaging instructors & effective teaching methods
  • +Relevant curriculum & practical skills development
  • +Supportive learning environment & strong community feel
  • +Supportive professors and clear teaching
  • +Welcoming and multicultural campus environment
  • +Good building infrastructure and friendly atmosphere
  • +Practical learning and real-world relevance
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +High-quality British education system
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Facilities, including classrooms and dormitories, are insufficient and neglected.
  • -Teaching methods and the quality of some academic staff are poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as uninspired and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
  • -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
  • -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
  • -Platform not consistently updated.
  • -Non-recognized degrees and credentials.
  • -Perceived waste of time and money.
  • -Administrative and staff issues are a significant problem.
  • -Unexpected and unjustified fees cause distress.
  • -Lack of transparency in financial matters is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Unresponsive faculty and poor communication create a negative experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution's internationality and professors received the highest marks, both scoring above 3.6. Facilities and value also garnered favorable reviews, around 3.5 and 3.3 respectively. However, student life, accommodation, and location were areas that received lower ratings, with accommodation being the weakest point. Overall, the university shows strengths in its global connections and academic staff, though improvements could be considered in campus life and housing.

This institution receives its highest marks for the quality of its professors, followed closely by its internationality and location. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and student life also received middling scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving strong scores around 4.67. Professors also earned a high mark of 4.67. The university's Facilities and Location received solid ratings of 4, while Accomodation scored slightly higher at 4.33. The weakest area, relative to its highest scores, appears to be Facilities and Location.

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.

Across all surveyed categories, this university receives consistently low ratings. Its performance is uniformly weak, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak relative to others. The institution scores a single point in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, indicating a pervasive need for improvement.

With a solid performance across multiple metrics, this institution excels particularly in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving strong ratings. **Student Life** and **Accommodations** present areas for potential improvement, as these received the lowest scores. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding reception.

Academic and value aspects of this university receive high marks, with professors and overall value scoring a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, the institution faces challenges in its physical environment and student experience, as evidenced by lower ratings in location, student life, and internationality, all at 2.5. Facilities and accommodation also fall in the mid-range at 3.5 and 3 respectively.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education, diverse student body, and amazing campus facilities. ~26% of feedback is negative, with some mentioning poor management and administrative issues.

About 70% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff and a good learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a 4.67 average rating from three reviews, students highly recommend the university, citing helpful staff and flexible programs. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.

With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.

With a single review and an average rating of 1/5, feedback is overwhelmingly negative (~100%). The primary concern is the perceived lack of university recognition and the resulting unmarketable degree, leading to regret over the investment of time and money.

Most reviews are positive (~74%) highlighting a friendly and multicultural environment, supportive professors, and good infrastructure. A small percentage of negative feedback (~7%) mentions issues with administrative processes and staff training.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the practical learning approach, supportive lecturers, and high-quality British education with a focus on relevant skills.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
20%
67%
7%
0%
21%
50%
4★
29%
50%
33%
90%
0%
43%
50%
3★
24%
30%
0%
1%
0%
29%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
0%
0%
100%
7%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The best option in Cyprus

Near East University is one of the oldest university located in North Cyrpus. The campus is in Nicosia and in the city centre. There are many faculties addressing to all kind of students. As Cyprus is a safe and easy country with regulations, many students from different countries prefer to study here. Almost 80 different nationality exists in university. Especially for social sciences, NEU gets high demand. For career, university is trying to compete with other worldwide universities. As a student do not have high expectations but you can easily receive a diploma to graduate from university.

Excellent

A renounced and progressive university that offers student with the best education and goes beyond and over to help students achieve excellence in their respective departments. An environment that supports and encourages student to strive .

My CIM (BVI) Now Global Business University - Europe Journey so far……

I previously studied for an undergraduate degree with The Cyprus Institute of Marketing (BVI) through a local center in Uganda – Center for International Studies. I then decided to continue my studies in 2017 with a graduate degree and opted to do the MSc in Fraud Auditing

UNIC in all ramification

UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.

Unrecognized University..

All I can say is it was my biggest regret to get Bachelors from cyprus institute of marketing.. I paid too much and i gt a degree which i cannot use anywhere. Nobody recognizes your university neither certificate.. My admissions to MBA were rejected because of your degree even in Europe because your it wasnt worth or got that credentials from cyprus edu board. Seriously i want to put a case on this uni and sue it. You waisted my time money and broke my dreams to study abroad instead i did the the projects in very hardworking manner. Even it cant be used in United Arab Emirates for visa requirements. If i would be there i will definently drag you guys to court for doing this to me. Yes i am student of CIMA and it ruined my life to be one. This is my feedback for you guys. IF ANYTHING U CAN DO IS TO CORRECT YOUR MISTAKE IS GIVE ME RECOGNIZED DEGREE. I would like to know your thoughts on it. Show quoted text

My experience at FIU

My experience at Final International University has been truly enriching. The quality of education is solid, with supportive professors who push us to think critically and apply what we learn. One of the things I appreciate most is the multicultural environment; studying alongside people from different backgrounds has broadened my perspective and made campus life vibrant and full of learning beyond the classroom. FIU isn’t just a university; it’s a place that challenges you, supports your growth, and helps you discover who you want to become.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close