Qafqaz University - QU vs Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University vs Azerbaijan Medical University vs Azerbaijan Technical University vs Baku State University

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Qafqaz University - QU: wins 0/6 categories
Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University: wins 5/6 categories
Azerbaijan Medical University: wins 0/6 categories
Azerbaijan Technical University: wins 0/6 categories
Baku State University: wins 1/6 categories
Khazar University - KHU: wins 0/6 categories
Western Caspian University - WCU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: International Affairs
Baku, Azerbaijan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Broad and in-depth subject coverage
  • +Extensive practical laboratory experience
  • +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
  • +Strong technical and English-language engineering programs
  • +Opportunities for collaborative projects
  • +Improved practical and real-world learning experiences

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong theoretical knowledge and knowledgeable academic staff.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with important global topics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create a negative student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of administrative and management support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Insufficient resources and opportunities for learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Review of this institution reveals a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no particular strengths or weaknesses to highlight; every aspect of the university's offering, from facilities and professors to student life and value, is assessed at the lowest possible mark. This indicates a need for comprehensive improvement across the board.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic and living environments. Professors and accommodation both received perfect scores, indicating high quality in teaching and student housing. Student life and internationality also scored highly, suggesting a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Facilities were rated well, but the location received a score of zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A university's strengths lie in its excellent **Location** (4.5) and highly-regarded **Professors** (4) and **Student Life** (4). Areas with room for improvement include **Facilities** (3) and **Accomodation** (3.5), though these still receive adequate scores. Internationality and value for money are also well-rated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students report a very positive experience. One student highlighted extensive chemistry coursework as unexpected for their education department.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights strong technical engineering education in English and collaborative project opportunities. Some desire for more practical, real-world application in courses exists.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one positive review, students highlight strong theoretical knowledge and knowledgeable staff. The primary criticism (~50%) is the lack of practical training and real-world application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Faculty

It's a great university, they take studied seriously and it's a calm environment to study mbbs, but it comes with its own draw backs , one may not get excellent faculty since there are different for different subjects, apart from that there is nothing wrong in the uni .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close