emlyon business school vs Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies - NMIMS vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and practical application focus
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty with real-world insights
- +Opportunities for internships, hands-on learning, and career preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong engineering and technology programs
- +Dedicated study and rigorous qualification processes
- +Management education expansion
- +Engaging and holistic learning experiences
- +Strong faculty and peer interactions
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and events
- +Diverse course options and activities
- +Extensive campus facilities
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administrative staff.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from administration and faculty is a significant issue.
- -Heavy workload and challenging academic rigor are often cited as sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the real world.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic and environmental offerings. Professors are highly regarded, receiving a near-perfect score, closely followed by location and value for money, both excelling. Student life and facilities also score well, indicating a positive overall campus experience. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. Internationality is also a moderate area, performing just above average.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, earning high marks for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, all rated a solid 4 out of 5. Student life also scores well at 3.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with notable strengths.
This institution excels in several key areas, with outstanding scores for location and student life, alongside a perfect rating for value. Professors also receive a commendable evaluation. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present significant weaknesses, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is identified as the sole area of concern, receiving the lowest possible rating.
This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its facilities and student life are rated a perfect 5, with location also receiving top marks. Accommodation scores highly at 4.5. While internationality is strong at 4, professors represent the weakest area with a 3.5 rating. Overall value is considered good at 4.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With an average rating of 4.73, virtually all (around ~100%) of the 64 reviews are positive. Students praise the enriching curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and industry-relevant projects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a high average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight globally recognized excellence in engineering and technology, with some programs expanding into management. There is no negative feedback.
With one review, the SIES MBA program received a perfect 5/5 rating. The student praised its enriching curriculum, faculty, and diverse peers, suggesting more industry-focused events would improve the experience. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students appreciate the variety of courses and extensive campus facilities, including sports courts. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show