London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Kingston University - KU vs London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM vs London Business Training and Consulting vs Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)
Side-by-side comparison from 420 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Knowledgeable, approachable faculty and relevant, practical course content
- +Supportive transition and inclusive campus environment with growth opportunities
- +Good quality teaching and accessible location with city connections
- +Engaging and effective learning platforms
- +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
- +Practical application through simulators
Nothing to show
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
- +Digital marketing knowledge for career advancement
- +Improved understanding of customer journey and collaboration
- +Strong academic resources and LSE curriculum
- +Effective administration and flexible learning environment
- +Cooperative professors and engaging teaching methods
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and a lack of student support.
- -Inexperienced or uncaring faculty and a scattered course structure.
- -Lack of resources impacting the learning experience.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of communication and transparency causes frustration.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university receives commendation across several metrics, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area at 4.30. Facilities and Value also score well, both above 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.61, indicating room for improvement in this category. Student Life and Location also present solid, though not top-tier, scores.
Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.
Nothing to show
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution has received outstanding ratings. Every aspect, from its facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, scored a perfect five. The university also excels in its location and internationality. Notably, the value proposition is exceptionally strong, reflecting a consistently high level of quality across the board with no discernible weaknesses.
This institution receives very positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5 or higher. **Location** and **Internationality** also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating among the surveyed areas, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are consistently strong.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable faculty, relevant courses, and good facilities. A small percentage (~2.5%) express concerns about management, resources, and disorganized student activities.
The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating highly positive sentiment. The reviewer found the course beneficial for professional development and collaboration in marketing.
University of London reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.63. Students praise job-ready skills, cooperative professors, excellent VLE, and comprehensive programs with LSE curriculum. Some noted challenges with online learning and lack of face-to-face interaction.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
Nothing to show
In my opinion choosing UOL for my undergrad was the best decision of my life. It not only taught be job ready skills it taught me how to approach a difficult task and win. The VLE portal was just awesome. The VLE or virtual learning environment provided me with necessary course and study material. Which was very helpful for a better understanding of Law.
