University of British Columbia vs SkyQuest Aviation Ltd - SQA vs Lighthouse Labs vs Langara College vs LaSalle College Vancouver

Side-by-side comparison from 205 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of British Columbia: wins 2/6 categories
SkyQuest Aviation Ltd - SQA: wins 0/6 categories
Lighthouse Labs: wins 0/6 categories
Langara College: wins 2/6 categories
LaSalle College Vancouver: wins 1/6 categories
VanWest College: wins 0/6 categories
Canadian College: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Arts
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Vancouver, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Vancouver, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Associate of Arts
Best programme: Fashion Marketing and Communication
Vancouver, Canada
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Vancouver, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital and Social Media Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
4.00
3.00
3.00
Location
4.46
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
4.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.35
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.30
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
1.50
4.00
3.00
Value
4.09
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
Win
3.50
3.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
3.00
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and quality academic programs
  • +Excellent facilities and welcoming student community
  • +Abundant resources and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +- Convenient location and accessible transit
  • +- Strong academic programs and faculty support
  • +- Affordable tuition and financial aid
  • +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and equipment
  • +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
  • +Supportive and professional instructors and advisors
  • +Creative teaching approach and personalized attention
  • +Close-knit and supportive campus environment
  • +Engaging instructors and effective presentation skills development
  • +Foundational knowledge in social media campaign planning
  • +Desire for more practical, hands-on learning experiences
Cons
  • -Course selection and academic planning are difficult.
  • -Poor quality teaching in some classes and arbitrary grading exist.
  • -Social life outside of clubs is often disappointing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of knowledgeable instructors.
  • -Social isolation and difficulty forming friendships.
  • -Inconvenient location with limited food options.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
  • -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated and inadequate.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of clear communication
Rating summary
What students say

This university scores highly across most surveyed aspects, with location emerging as its strongest point at 4.45. Student life and internationality also received excellent marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.86, which is notably lower than other categories. Facilities, professors, and value for money all fall within a solid, mid-range score of 4.08 to 4.21.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives generally strong ratings, with several areas achieving a score of 4.17. Notably, **Facilities**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are its highest-rated aspects. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are rated slightly lower but remain solid at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a consistent, positive image across these metrics.

This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.

This institution demonstrates a notably strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a 3. The university also received solid ratings for its **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4), with **Internationality** and **Value** falling in the mid-range.

This institution showcases a mixed but generally positive performance according to the provided ratings. It excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness with a rating of 1. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are rated moderately at 3, while Value is strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~86% positive reviews and an average 4.23 rating, students praise academic programs, supportive professors, and excellent facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions challenges with course selection and finding genuine connections.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Most reviews are positive (~83%), highlighting convenient location, strong support for diverse students, reasonable costs, and friendly staff. One negative review cited antisocial students and poor teaching from some instructors.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one positive review out of two, approximately 50% of feedback highlights a supportive campus environment and creative instructors. The average rating is 3.5/5, with no negative reviews.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the program 4/5 stars. Students appreciated energetic instructors and found presentations helpful for public speaking and learning social media campaign planning fundamentals. Some noted a lack of job-readiness and need for more hands-on programs.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
4★
49%
0%
0%
17%
100%
50%
100%
3★
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

convenient location, small class.

The college has a strong reputation for providing quality education and has been consistently ranked as one of the top colleges in Canada. What I like about Langara College include its diverse and inclusive community, its supportive and knowledgeable faculty, and its modern facilities and technology. Additionally, the college offers a variety of extracurricular activities, including sports teams, clubs, and events, that allow students to get involved and make connections with others. On the other hand, some students and faculty members may dislike certain aspects of Langara College, such as the high cost of tuition, limited parking options, or crowded classrooms during peak times. However, these factors may vary depending on individual circumstances and experiences.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

DIGITAL MARKETING

Pros Energetic instructors Gain the fundamental knowledge of social media campaign planning A LOT of presentations are helpful for public speaking Cons Not good enough to gain a job in marketing/social media Needs more hands-on programs or self-learning

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close