Escuela Superior de Diseño ESDi - ESDI vs Nazarbayev University - NU vs Homs University vs University of Chicago Booth vs Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman - UTAR
Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Friendly environment and well-prepared teachers
- +Engaging and interesting classes
- +Good canteen facilities
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Engaged faculty and relevant curriculum.
- +Fair and appropriate assessments.
- +Satisfactory overall experience.
- +Strong academics and challenging yet rewarding learning environment
- +Supportive and highly educated professors
- +University's ability to fulfill career aspirations
- +quality education and useful skills
- +supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +valuable extracurricular activities and affordable fees
- +Strong academic programs and opportunities for high-achieving students.
- +Practical, real-world learning and accessible, experienced professors
- +Well-equipped, conducive learning environment with good resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently cited as disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear learning objectives are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to frustration.
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and effective communication from staff is consistently criticized.
With outstanding scores in Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value, this institution excels in core academic and experiential offerings. Areas for potential improvement include Location and Student Life, both receiving moderate ratings. Accommodation is also viewed positively, though not reaching the top tier. Overall, the university presents a strong case, particularly for those prioritizing academic quality and global engagement.
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
With a stellar score for its location, this university excels in providing a desirable setting. However, it faces significant challenges in student accommodation and internationality, both receiving the lowest possible rating. Other areas, including professors and student life, fall into the middle range, while facilities and overall value are rated as below average.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all received a solid 4 out of 5. Student life and accommodation are areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in academic and logistical aspects.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest suit. Professors and Student Life also earned particularly high ratings. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the greatest opportunity for improvement, alongside Facilities and Accommodation, which received moderate scores. Location is also a well-regarded aspect.
This institution demonstrates solid strengths in key areas, with facilities, location, and value all receiving a respectable 3 out of 5. Conversely, student life and accommodation are significant weak points, scoring only 1. Internationality and professor quality also represent areas for improvement, each rated at 2.5.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive performance, with standout strengths in its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. Areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** are also well-regarded, achieving solid ratings. The university's **accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, receiving a moderate score. Overall, it offers good value, indicating a solid, though not perfect, experience.
With a 5/5 average rating from a single review, this university is overwhelmingly praised. The student highlighted a friendly environment, well-prepared English-speaking teachers with interesting classes, and a good canteen offering breakfast, lunch, and even beer.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
One review averaged 4/5 stars. Positive feedback, making up ~100% of comments, suggests a satisfactory experience.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students are excited about attending, and find the academic rigor challenging and rewarding. Professors are described as highly educated and supportive.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 8 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise the excellent education quality, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and useful curriculum. The university also encourages soft skill development and offers affordable fees in a good learning environment.
With a 3/5 average rating, student feedback is split. Approximately 50% of reviews are negative, citing outdated curricula and unengaging lectures. Conversely, about 50% are positive, highlighting splendid opportunities for high-achieving students.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. This student found the Master's program balanced theory and practice, with competent professors. The campus location and library resources were also appreciated.
In my opinion the school has a friendly environment and staff. I have classes in English and I find the teachers well prepared and have interesting classes. It has a good cantine with breakfast and lunch, you can even buy beer as well.
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a really bad university. The curriculum of my faculty was old for about 5-10 years, so university could not give us needed knowledge for our future job. Professors always read from their notebooks lecture and ask for students to write them.
Nothing to show
