Almaty Management University - ALMA vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Turan University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs Suleyman Demirel University

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Almaty Management University - ALMA: wins 0/5 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 5/5 categories
Turan University: wins 0/5 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 0/5 categories
Suleyman Demirel University: wins 0/5 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/5 categories
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Advertising
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Management
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Best programme: Journalism
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.08
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.28
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
2.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.97
Not rated
3.25
Student life
5.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
3.94
Not rated
4.25
Value
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.97
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.23
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and engaging professors
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging student community
  • +Accessible and approachable instructors
  • +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
  • +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
  • +Strong career support and employment opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Extensive program variety and robust infrastructure
  • +Valuable research opportunities and international collaboration
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated teaching methods and materials are a significant concern.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of modern facilities and resources hinders the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Regarding university ratings, student life stands out as a significant strength, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable weakness with a low rating. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are rated moderately. Location receives a strong positive score, while internationality is somewhat lower.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **facilities** and **professors** are rated as areas with the most room for improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with strong showings in student experience and accessibility.

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

The institution receives particularly strong marks for its **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.25, closely followed by the quality of professors at 4. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3, along with its facilities at 3.5. Internationality is moderately rated at 3.25, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one positive review and no negative feedback, the university receives an average rating of 3.5/5. This suggests a generally positive student experience, with ~50% of feedback being positive and ~0% negative.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This single piece of feedback highlights good people, though it also mentions rising prices and some professors lacking competence.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and good research. ~25% of feedback mentions a traditional learning approach.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
0%
9%
0%
50%
4★
50%
0%
0%
100%
72%
0%
0%
3★
50%
50%
0%
0%
19%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close