IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs EDHEC Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Ascencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 369 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Ascencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 7/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: Business Administration
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.22
4.20
4.00
3.20
5.00
Win
3.92
Location
4.29
4.66
3.73
3.57
4.20
5.00
Win
4.92
Professors
4.28
4.12
4.32
4.00
4.20
5.00
Win
4.62
Internationality
4.55
4.63
4.41
4.14
3.80
5.00
Win
4.92
Student life
4.25
4.30
4.14
3.71
2.80
5.00
Win
4.15
Value
4.31
4.49
4.05
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.23
Accommodation
3.78
4.00
3.14
3.50
3.00
5.00
Win
3.62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, with practical and theoretical knowledge.
  • +Supportive learning environment and engaging discussions with diverse peers.
  • +Easy access to materials and responsive faculty.
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development
  • +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Cons
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including technology.
  • -Lack of relevant curriculum and insufficient career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
  • -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

The university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Professors** and **Location**, both scoring 4.2. **Value** also received a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8. Other categories like Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within the mid-range, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting exceptional education, supportive faculty, and a rewarding learning experience. Convenience with materials and approachable lecturers are frequently praised. No negative reviews were provided.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
63%
39%
43%
40%
100%
69%
4★
44%
27%
52%
29%
40%
0%
23%
3★
9%
10%
9%
14%
20%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Nothing to show

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Personal university Review

I must admit at first it was a bit hard and confusing, having good lecturers helped a lot with my studying journey and I was able to contact the after the lecture. Accessing the materials and student portal was easy, convenient and up to date. Very happy with my experience.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close