Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Satbayev University vs Turan University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP
Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and inspiring teaching
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and belonging
- +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and focus on practical skills
- +International collaboration and exchange opportunities
- +Opportunities for in-demand professions and research
Nothing to show
- +Engaging student community
- +Accessible and approachable instructors
- +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
- +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
- +Strong career support and employment opportunities
- +Good professors and modern campus
- +Strong support from the admission office
- +Effective advertising and diverse student body
- -Boring training system.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management are prevalent.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of student support and resources.
This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.
This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.
Overall, this institution receives excellent marks, with a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a comprehensive and well-rounded experience. Accommodations represent the sole area for potential improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, suggesting a strong return on investment for students.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **facilities** and **professors** are rated as areas with the most room for improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with strong showings in student experience and accessibility.
Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.
The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university is highly regarded. The feedback highlights excellent educational programs and international opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible, representing 0%.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This single piece of feedback highlights good people, though it also mentions rising prices and some professors lacking competence.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show