Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Satbayev University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs Suleyman Demirel University vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Satbayev University (5.00)
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 1/4 categories
Satbayev University: wins 3/4 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 0/4 categories
Suleyman Demirel University: wins 0/4 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/4 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/4 categories
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Best programme: Journalism
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
3.00
4.08
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
2.97
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
Student life
4.50
5.00
5.00
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Value
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
3.23
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and focus on practical skills
  • +International collaboration and exchange opportunities
  • +Opportunities for in-demand professions and research
  • +Engaging student community
  • +Accessible and approachable instructors
  • +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
  • +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
  • +Strong career support and employment opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Extensive program variety and robust infrastructure
  • +Valuable research opportunities and international collaboration
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management are prevalent.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated teaching methods and materials are a significant concern.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of modern facilities and resources hinders the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks, with a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a comprehensive and well-rounded experience. Accommodations represent the sole area for potential improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, suggesting a strong return on investment for students.

This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **facilities** and **professors** are rated as areas with the most room for improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with strong showings in student experience and accessibility.

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The institution receives particularly strong marks for its **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.25, closely followed by the quality of professors at 4. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3, along with its facilities at 3.5. Internationality is moderately rated at 3.25, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university is highly regarded. The feedback highlights excellent educational programs and international opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible, representing 0%.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This single piece of feedback highlights good people, though it also mentions rising prices and some professors lacking competence.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and good research. ~25% of feedback mentions a traditional learning approach.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
0%
9%
0%
0%
50%
4★
0%
0%
100%
72%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close