Almaty Management University - ALMA vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Satbayev University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Satbayev University (5.00)
Almaty Management University - ALMA: wins 0/5 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 1/5 categories
Satbayev University: wins 4/5 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 0/5 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/5 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Advertising
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
5.00
5.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and engaging professors
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and focus on practical skills
  • +International collaboration and exchange opportunities
  • +Opportunities for in-demand professions and research
  • +Engaging programs foster passion and develop essential skills.
  • +Positive peer relationships and community atmosphere are highly valued.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management are prevalent.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Regarding university ratings, student life stands out as a significant strength, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable weakness with a low rating. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are rated moderately. Location receives a strong positive score, while internationality is somewhat lower.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks, with a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a comprehensive and well-rounded experience. Accommodations represent the sole area for potential improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, suggesting a strong return on investment for students.

This institution receives strong commendations, particularly in its location, student life, internationality, and value, all scoring a high 4.5. Accommodation is also well-regarded at 4. The academic staff are rated favorably at 4. The weakest area noted is facilities, which still achieve a solid 3.5 out of 5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one positive review and no negative feedback, the university receives an average rating of 3.5/5. This suggests a generally positive student experience, with ~50% of feedback being positive and ~0% negative.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university is highly regarded. The feedback highlights excellent educational programs and international opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible, representing 0%.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 stars and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's journalism program for fostering a passion for storytelling and communication. A minor concern about rising tuition and some professor competence was outweighed by positive social experiences.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close