United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Osaka University vs About Madagascar National Tele-Education Center - CNTEMAD vs Jinnah University for Women - JUW

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kansai University - KU (5.00)
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 0/4 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Osaka University: wins 1/4 categories
About Madagascar National Tele-Education Center - CNTEMAD: wins 0/4 categories
Jinnah University for Women - JUW: wins 0/4 categories
Batterjee Medical College - BMC: wins 0/4 categories
Kansai University - KU: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.75
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.75
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
4.25
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.25
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
  • +Affordable and tasty food options

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Vibrant, traditional university environment
  • +Wide range of academic studies and research
  • +Active pursuit of sports
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance from instructors is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Remarkable strengths are evident in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating this as a clear area for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students praise its vibrant campus, diverse academic and research opportunities, and active sports scene.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Master’s degree

Excellent academic environment. Friendly lab mates and professors. Food service is inexpensive and delicious. The only thing I dislike was the extreme humid and hot summer days. Other than that, everything is excellent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close