Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua II - ITCH II vs University of Maiduguri vs École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale vs Borno State University, Maiduguri vs Arsi University - Aru

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua II - ITCH II (4.30)
Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua II - ITCH II: wins 4/7 categories
University of Maiduguri: wins 3/7 categories
École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale: wins 0/7 categories
Borno State University, Maiduguri: wins 0/7 categories
Arsi University - Aru: wins 0/7 categories
Jarvis Christian University - JCC: wins 0/7 categories
Chattagram International Dental College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Geology
Best programme: Anesthesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Win
3.52
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
Win
3.62
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
3.07
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.50
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.50
3.83
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.29
Not rated
Not rated
1.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Accessible tuition fees
  • +Encouraging entrepreneurial spirit
  • +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
  • +Rigorous and rewarding academic programs
  • +Resilient and diverse learning community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered focus and responsiveness to needs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not align with current industry needs.
  • -Lack of attention to student welfare and academic focus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received positive feedback, all scoring 4. However, the university's internationality is identified as a weaker area, with a rating of 2.5. Ratings for professors and overall value are moderate, both at 3.5.

Overall, this university garners favorable reviews, with **Professors** emerging as the strongest area at a perfect 4. The **Value** for money also scores highly at 3.83. Conversely, **Internationality** is identified as the weakest point, rated at 3.07. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation fall within a moderate range of performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shows considerable strengths in its **value** and **internationality**, both scoring a solid 3.5 and 3 respectively. **Professors** and **location** also receive favorable marks at 3. However, **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness with a rating of just 1.5. Areas needing improvement include **facilities** (2) and **student life** (2.5).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise inspiring teachers, a helpful library with ample resources, and the university's affordability. Some note a need for facility improvements.

With ~55% positive reviews, students praise dedicated lecturers, diverse programs, and a supportive community. A small amount of negative feedback highlights concerns with administrative delays and infrastructure issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~50% of feedback is positive. One reviewer recommended focusing on student needs, while no negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
67%
34%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
41%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Perfect review

The University of Maiduguri is a resilient institution with dedicated lecturers, diverse academic programs, and a supportive student community. The campus provides a generally conducive environment for learning despite regional challenges. However, administrative delays, infrastructural issues like electricity and water supply, and limited digital systems remain areas needing improvement. Overall, it is a strong and impactful place to study.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close