University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Széchenyi István University - SZE vs University of Miskolc vs Wekerle International University
Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
- +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
- +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
- +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
- +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
- +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
- +Supportive and approachable academic staff
- +Modern campus facilities and pleasant environment
- +Opportunities for practical learning and international interaction
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
Nothing to show
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
- -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
- -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
- -Lack of social life and engaging events
- -Insufficient or poorly managed administrative support
- -Outdated or inadequate facilities
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.
This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.
Among surveyed categories, student life and internationality stand out with strong ratings of 4.28 and 4.4 respectively. Accommodation also scores well at 4.36. The university's weakest area is value, with a rating of 3.87, while facilities receive a solid 4. Professors and location are also rated positively. Overall, the institution demonstrates a generally favorable standing across its evaluated aspects.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive, highlighting a modern campus, supportive academic staff, and good facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (~7%) mentions a lack of social life and events.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Due to unexpected circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic students faced some issues regarding accommodation in which they were moving from dormitory to another within one week. during the online study and since this is the first time the university conducts such an approach the outcome was satisfactory due to some delays in response and lack of some material ( sessions on Zoom meeting ), However, overall study experience is good. Not only the study experience was good also the university organized events for international studies on a monthly basis for site seeing to explore cities in Hungary in addition to other indoor events within the university premises, but the university also has several sports training and activities, social gathering to maintain the well-being of the students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
