Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja - UTPL vs Universidad Nacional de Loja - Unl vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vega School (5.00)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja - UTPL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Loja - Unl: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/7 categories
Vega School: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Interior Design
Cape Town, South Africa
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: BCom
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.80
Win
4.04
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.80
Location
4.32
5.00
Win
4.46
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Professors
4.27
4.60
Win
4.08
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Internationality
4.14
4.40
3.96
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.40
Student life
4.36
4.60
Win
3.79
3.67
4.50
Not rated
3.20
Value
4.10
4.60
3.96
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.88
4.40
Win
3.57
3.00
4.00
Not rated
2.80
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning
  • +High-quality education and academic development
  • +Supportive professors and guidance for potential
  • +Flexible learning options and intuitive platforms
  • +Supportive, clear teaching and practical learning
  • +Encouraging, participatory environment
  • +Positive overall experience
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +supportive and attentive lecturers/facilitators
  • +engaging campus environment and connections with peers
  • +strong emphasis on practical application and real-world learning
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Narrow-minded and unhelpful faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

The university scores well in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest point. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received favorable ratings. However, **Accomodation** presents a weaker area, followed by **Student Life**, suggesting these aspects could be improved. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance, particularly in its geographic positioning and academic resources.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, notably receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and value also received positive ratings. However, accommodation and internationality represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3 out of a possible 5.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

An overall assessment reveals a university with significant strengths in several key areas. Exceptional scores were awarded for **Value** (5.0), **Professors** (4.4), **Location** (4.4), and **Internationality** (4.4). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.8) and **Student Life** (3.2) represent the weakest aspects of the institution, indicating room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

The university garners ~74% positive reviews, praised for academic development, research opportunities, and supportive professors. A small portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with faculty narrow-mindedness and unhelpful administration.

The university receives largely positive feedback, with ~33% of reviews being highly positive. Students appreciate supportive teachers and a conducive learning environment, though some note room for improvement in organization. There is no negative feedback recorded.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

All five reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the university's supportive environment, engaging campus life, and effective learning experiences. There were no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
44%
33%
50%
0%
100%
4★
42%
33%
28%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
8%
0%
16%
67%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close