EU Business School vs Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne - EPFL vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs BHMS Business & Hotel Management School - B.H.M.S vs Alfred Nobel Open Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 309 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive community and approachable, knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Practical, engaging courses with real-world business insights
- +Strong research & innovation focus
- +Affordable tuition
- +Welcoming environment & clear processes
- +Supportive community and personal growth
- +Blend of academic rigor and practical opportunities
- +Engaging curriculum and passionate faculty
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Engaging, real-world focused professors and interactive learning
- +Opportunities for practical application and recognition through competitions
- +Personal growth and boosted confidence
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- -Disorganized administration and management issues.
- -Poor quality education and unsupportive facilities.
- -Lack of accreditation and questionable educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and communication creates dissatisfaction.
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Many students find the facilities to be outdated and lacking.
- -Concerns are raised about the quality and relevance of the curriculum.
- -Poor staff attitude and a lack of care for students are significant issues.
- -Unfulfilled promises and misleading information create a negative student experience.
- -Inadequate facilities and miserable conditions contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and job placement opportunities are a major concern.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out at an impressive 4.7. Student Life also scores well, nearing 4.2. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable weaker point, receiving a score of 3.46. Facilities and Professors both hover around the 4.0 mark, with Value slightly lower at 3.87.
The university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Internationality** and **Facilities**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, the institution scores well in **Professors** and **Value**, with good marks also for **Student Life**. **Location** falls in the mid-range.
This institution garners excellent scores, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities and Student Life also received exceptionally high marks. While still strong, Location shows the lowest rating compared to other evaluated aspects, though overall feedback indicates a very positive university experience.
This institution receives its highest marks for Location, with a perfect score. Student Life and Internationality are also strong areas, both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, Value for Money is the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Facilities and Professors, which also received moderate scores. Accommodations fall in the middle range of ratings.
Remarkably, this institution achieves top scores in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are Professors and Internationality, both earning a perfect 5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value are also highly rated at 4. The only area not explicitly detailed is the weakest, but the consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded university experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, strong community, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. A small percentage (~7.6%) of negative feedback points to disorganization and a basic curriculum.
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the university's excellence in education and research, collaborative environment, and affordable cost.
Students praise the supportive atmosphere and diverse opportunities. The curriculum is effective, fostering personal growth and career readiness. While overwhelmingly positive, there are zero negative reviews.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, industry connections, and supportive lecturers. Two reviews (about 22%) express dissatisfaction with staff rudeness and perceived broken promises.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight inspiring professors, interactive classes, and significant personal growth.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
It is a great university, well ranked worldwide, with a beautiful view on the lac and the Alpes from the campus. The courses and the programs are really interesting, the teachers are smart, but you have to work a lot, specially during the first year of bachelor, which is a kind of selective year.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
To be honest compared to other universities BHMS did not strike me as a great choice in the first place. However, the 2 semesters per year, where in the first one you study and in the second one you do an internship is a really great way of learning. I have gotten great opportunities and met many people here. I would like to highlight my professor; Mr. Marcel Enzler. He is an amazing lecturer who truly believes in his students and also tries to elevate the school to the best of his abilities. After doing my studies here for 3 years, I would like to see them make the first and second year curriculum fit the industry requirements and standards. Because they are very easy courses and once you are in third year you start struggling a lot. Other than that I immensely enjoyed my time here.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
