emlyon business school vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 176 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
emlyon business school: wins 1/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 5/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
École spéciale des travaux publics, du bâtiment et de l'industrie - ESTP: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Master in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
55 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
3.98
4.44
Win
4.02
3.83
Not rated
4.33
Location
4.60
4.06
4.74
Win
4.26
4.32
Not rated
4.50
Professors
4.06
4.13
4.75
3.93
3.96
Not rated
4.80
Win
Internationality
4.60
Win
4.35
4.60
4.33
3.88
Not rated
4.60
Student life
4.25
4.04
4.56
Win
4.26
4.22
Not rated
4.33
Value
4.43
4.13
4.50
Win
3.99
3.83
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.94
3.72
4.32
Win
3.58
3.46
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
  • +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
  • +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Career preparation and alumni network
  • +High-quality education with specialization options and practical experience
  • +Vibrant campus life and strong community with supportive peers and professors
  • +Excellent career preparation through industry connections and internships

Nothing to show

  • +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
  • -Unresponsive and critical professors.
  • -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
  • -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
  • -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor English communication.
  • -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
  • -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.

Among the evaluated aspects, the university excels in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.32, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.22. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.46. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably, generally falling between 3.8 and 3.96, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.

Most reviews (~74%) praise the quality of education, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage (8.3%) mention unprepared professors and organizational issues.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
32%
75%
33%
33%
0%
40%
4★
28%
63%
25%
55%
46%
0%
60%
3★
9%
0%
0%
9%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
4%
4%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
2%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close