Turan University vs Suleyman Demirel University vs University of Central Asia vs Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University vs Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Narxoz University - Narxoz (4.00)
Turan University: wins 0/7 categories
Suleyman Demirel University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/7 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.: wins 2/7 categories
International Information Technologies University - IITU: wins 0/7 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism
Almaty, Kazakhstan
4.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.08
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
2.97
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.23
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
  • +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
  • +Strong career support and employment opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Extensive program variety and robust infrastructure
  • +Valuable research opportunities and international collaboration

Nothing to show

  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated teaching methods and materials are a significant concern.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of modern facilities and resources hinders the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The institution receives particularly strong marks for its **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.25, closely followed by the quality of professors at 4. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3, along with its facilities at 3.5. Internationality is moderately rated at 3.25, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and good research. ~25% of feedback mentions a traditional learning approach.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
9%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
0%
72%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
19%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close