IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 421 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 1/7 categories
Rennes School of Business: wins 1/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 5/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole de Management IFAG: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: International Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.08
4.03
4.15
Win
4.13
4.01
3.86
2.00
Location
4.29
4.25
4.60
Win
3.75
4.22
4.33
3.00
Professors
4.28
Win
4.22
4.06
4.13
3.90
3.95
4.00
Internationality
4.55
4.32
4.60
Win
4.13
4.29
3.86
4.00
Student life
4.25
4.35
Win
4.25
3.63
4.26
4.24
3.00
Value
4.31
4.11
4.43
Win
4.13
3.95
3.77
3.00
Accommodation
3.78
3.75
3.94
Win
3.57
3.52
3.50
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international and diverse community
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Practical and real-world focused learning
  • +International and experienced faculty
  • +Welcoming and diverse community
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and relevant, practical programs
  • +Strong student support and career development resources
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
  • +Practical and applied learning methods
  • +Vibrant student life and international opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
  • -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
  • -Superficial academic content and lack of depth in courses.
  • -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
  • -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.

Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.26), and **Location** (4.22). Facilities and value also receive solid marks. The weakest area, while still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.52). Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience with distinct advantages in fostering an international and engaging student community.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.

University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

~94% of 52 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teaching, professors, and career preparation. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.

With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
49%
41%
60%
38%
31%
27%
0%
4★
44%
57%
28%
38%
57%
50%
0%
3★
8%
3%
9%
13%
8%
14%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
5%
0%
1★
0%
3%
2%
13%
2%
5%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close