Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs ABE International Business College - ABE vs Arab Open University vs United University

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media: wins 0/3 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 1/3 categories
ABE International Business College - ABE : wins 2/3 categories
Arab Open University: wins 0/3 categories
United University: wins 0/3 categories
University of Agder - uia: wins 0/3 categories
University of South-Eastern Norway: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Business Administration
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Allahabad, India
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Kristiansand, Norway
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Renewable Energy Engineering
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.71
5.00
4.40
4.00
5.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.14
Win
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
Professors
Not rated
4.43
5.00
4.80
5.00
4.00
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
4.40
4.00
4.00
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.29
5.00
4.40
5.00
4.00
4.00
Value
Not rated
4.14
5.00
Win
4.40
4.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.71
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Quality education and English proficiency
  • +Friendly student environment
  • +Supportive instructors
  • +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
  • +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
  • +Strong academic programs and quality instruction
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Welcoming international environment and modern facilities
  • +Excellent research opportunities and advanced tools
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +strong technical and practical focus on systems
  • +sustainability and real-world application
  • +analytical thinking and problem-solving
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are sometimes insufficient or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
  • -Concerns are raised about the relevance and quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be subpar.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptional scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding strengths. The location, however, received a more modest rating of 3, suggesting this is the sole area for potential improvement.

Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.

Overall, this institution garners strong approval, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Accomodation** also achieves a top rating. Its **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The **Location** is the sole area with a slightly lower score of 3, indicating it's the weakest point in this assessment.

This institution garners high marks across most aspects, with outstanding facilities rated a perfect 5. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all receive a solid 4. The strongest area is clearly its facilities, while the other evaluated categories demonstrate a consistently strong, though less exceptional, performance.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With one review available, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (100%). The single review highlighted quality education and a friendly environment, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, the single review highlights exceptional academic experiences and an esteemed reputation. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a positive experience. The feedback highlights a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and opportunities for research skill development.

The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
29%
100%
60%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
57%
0%
20%
0%
100%
100%
3★
0%
14%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close