Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU vs Caucasus University - CIU vs Ilia State University - ISU vs Georgian Technical University - GTU vs Alte University

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU (4.30)
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University - TSU: wins 6/7 categories
Caucasus University - CIU: wins 1/7 categories
Ilia State University - ISU: wins 0/7 categories
Georgian Technical University - GTU: wins 0/7 categories
Alte University: wins 0/7 categories
International Black Sea University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Tbilisi, Georgia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.71
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.25
Win
2.71
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.38
Win
3.57
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.76
Win
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.57
Win
2.86
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.14
Win
3.43
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
Win
2.67
2.70
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Valued knowledge and practical experience gained.
  • +Appreciated knowledgeable and supportive professors and academic environment.
  • +Enjoyed diverse student community and engaging student life.
  • +Comprehensive business programs
  • +Experienced, professional tutors
  • +Modern facilities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Welcoming and helpful atmosphere
  • +Freedom and opportunities for growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Financial focus over educational quality
  • -Poor instructor qualifications
  • -Lack of student well-being consideration
  • -Outdated teaching methods and lack of practical application.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives a mixed but generally positive review, with its strongest performances in **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.25). **Value** also scores well at 4.14. The weakest areas, requiring attention, are **Facilities** at 3 and **Student Life** at 3.57. Accommodation and Internationality fall within the mid-range of ratings.

Assessments reveal a university with notable strengths in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, with **location** and **student life** also scoring below average. Other areas, including professors, internationality, and value, received moderate to good reviews, suggesting a mixed but generally solid experience, with notable room for improvement in practical student support and campus environment.

This institution achieves its highest marks in **Location** (4.1) and **Professors** (3.8). Its **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 2.7. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are rated at a solid 3.5, while Value scores a respectable 3.6, indicating a generally positive, though not perfect, university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 23 reviews, ~91% express satisfaction. Students highly value the knowledge gained, positive learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. No negative feedback was reported.

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong business programs and experienced lecturers. ~14% of feedback is negative, primarily concerning financial focus and instructor qualifications. The average rating is 3.43/5.

~60% of reviews are positive, highlighting freedom, professor support, and university atmosphere. ~10% of feedback expresses concerns about theory-based education and lack of practical experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
14%
30%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
43%
30%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
29%
30%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
An average university

The university offers a basic education with standard facilities. The classrooms, labs, and libraries are functional but not impressive. The teachers are experienced and provide solid instruction, though there isn’t much advanced research or unique insight. Students get a good foundation in medical basics, but the university doesn’t have special programs or standout features. Clinical training is limited, and students may miss out on specialized rotations or advanced practices. Support services like academic advising and career counseling are not available. Campus life is average, with typical student activities and organizations. Overall, the university provides a reliable, straightforward education. It’s a good choice for those looking for a dependable path to becoming a healthcare professional without extra features or exceptional opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close