London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Greenwich School of Management vs Stanmore School Of Business - SSB vs London Academy of Trading - LAT

Side-by-side comparison from 367 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Stanmore School Of Business - SSB (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Stanmore School Of Business - SSB: wins 7/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
CIM The Chartered Institute of Marketing: wins 0/7 categories
University of London: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Management of Health Care Institutions
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.36
Location
4.78
4.74
3.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.42
Professors
4.26
4.75
3.85
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.35
Internationality
4.80
4.60
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.41
Student life
3.65
4.56
2.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.54
Value
4.05
4.50
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.59
Accommodation
3.80
4.32
1.85
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical learning and real-world skills
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Inclusive and collaborative environment
  • +Helpful, multilingual content and resources
  • +Focus on career-relevant qualifications

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent faculty and teaching quality
  • +Valuable job-ready skills and practical experience
  • +Accessible international degree and comprehensive online resources
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Limited course variety and depth.
  • -Inconsistent faculty quality and support.
  • -Inconvenient campus locations and access.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Inflexible academic policies and curriculum create significant challenges.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Insufficient resources and academic support.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Examining the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern. The strongest areas are Facilities and Value, both scoring a high 4.1. Internationality also performs well at 3.5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point with a low 1.85 rating. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating areas with potential for improvement.

This institution garners top marks across the board, with exceptional scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Every surveyed aspect received a perfect rating, indicating a comprehensively strong offering without any identified weak areas. The university excels in all facets, presenting a consistently outstanding experience for its students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Performance across university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Student Life stands out with the highest score, closely followed by Value and Location. Internationality also garners high marks. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest performance among the categories. Facilities and Professors receive solid, above-average ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience, though improvements in accommodation could further enhance the overall profile.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with roughly 50% negative feedback. Students appreciate practical learning and experienced faculty, but some note a limited course selection.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single review highlights a dream qualification, multilingual podcasts, and professional quizzes as key strengths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.65/5. Students praise the program, staff, faculty, and facilities. The VLE portal and academic resources are frequently highlighted as strengths.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
75%
50%
100%
0%
0%
65%
4★
44%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
3★
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Orthopedic Strategy AI

This London-based Business School made it possible for me to pursue my dream qualification in Orthopaedic Strategy AI. I love the multilingual podcasts, professional quizzes and helpful content. Highly recommended!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great

In my opinion choosing UOL for my undergrad was the best decision of my life. It not only taught be job ready skills it taught me how to approach a difficult task and win. The VLE portal was just awesome. The VLE or virtual learning environment provided me with necessary course and study material. Which was very helpful for a better understanding of Law.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close