Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Científica del Sur - UCSUR vs University of Applied Science Wiener Neustadt - FHWN vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Northumbria University
Side-by-side comparison from 141 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
- +Strong focus on professional and personal development
- +Positive peer relationships
- +Practical and theoretical learning experiences
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Encouraging discovery and vocational exploration
- +Flexible and practical part-time programs
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Small, organized structure for easy communication
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Engaging, hands-on learning and career readiness
- +Strong student support and guidance
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Accessible and user-friendly online platform
- +Affordable pricing and good institutional structure
- +Need for greater student engagement and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated and impractical program structures offering little specialization.
- -Lack of practical application and insufficient teaching of job-relevant skills.
- -Unsupportive and uninspiring teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support hinders learning.
This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.
This university presents a mixed profile based on student feedback. Its strongest areas lie in the quality of its professors, who received a rating of 4, and its facilities and location, both scoring 3.5. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its internationality, with a rating of 2.5, and student life and accommodation, both at 3. Value for money is also rated as average at 3.
With most aspects scoring a solid 4 or higher, this institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated at 4.33. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, each receiving a score of 4. The **Accomodation** stands at a respectable 3.5, while **Facilities** represent the lowest-rated area at 3.67.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This university receives its highest praise for its **location**, followed closely by **student life** and **facilities**. Areas scoring a bit lower, though still respectable, include **accommodation** and **value**. The university demonstrates a solid performance across most metrics, with professors and internationality also scoring favorably.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably a perfect 5 for location and value, and strong 4.5 ratings for professors and student life. Its facilities also earned a commendable 4. The weakest areas, however, are internationality, with a 2.5, and accommodation, receiving a 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.
With an average rating of 3.75/5 and no negative reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical learning and a supportive environment for discovering their vocations, particularly in fields like veterinary medicine. Some suggest expanding career services beyond Peru and offering vocational orientation.
All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the program structure, experienced professors, and practical, well-organized offerings. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Approximately 94.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcome initiatives, diverse programs, and helpful advisors. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) criticizes program structure and career relevance.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, reviews indicate a positive experience (~100% of feedback). One positive review highlighted an accessible online platform and good structure with affordable prices.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm currently in my fourth semester of the International Business Consultancy bachelor program, which is fully in English and has a highly international demographic. The week-to-week lectures are generally very theory-based but they do provide a solid foundation for business principles that are essential for creating value and ensuring the profitability of a business. What stands out about this program are the professors. A great deal of them are hired externally and have succesful careers in their respective area of business (marketing, finanace, or management.) This has been very valuable because it allows students to network with current business professionals. There are also many opportunites for students with an entrepreneurial spirit. The university is very supportive of students that want to start their own business or have creative business ideas (bonus points if it's a sustainable business idea). I truly believe that students "get back what they put in" when it comes to this program. Also, the university is only 30-minutes by train to Vienna!
Nothing to show
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
