Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Satbayev University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University vs Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University

Side-by-side comparison from 5 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Satbayev University (5.00)
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 0/3 categories
Satbayev University: wins 2/3 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 0/3 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/3 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/3 categories
International Information Technologies University - IITU: wins 0/3 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and focus on practical skills
  • +International collaboration and exchange opportunities
  • +Opportunities for in-demand professions and research
  • +Engaging student community
  • +Accessible and approachable instructors

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management are prevalent.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks, with a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a comprehensive and well-rounded experience. Accommodations represent the sole area for potential improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, suggesting a strong return on investment for students.

This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **facilities** and **professors** are rated as areas with the most room for improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with strong showings in student experience and accessibility.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university is highly regarded. The feedback highlights excellent educational programs and international opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible, representing 0%.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This single piece of feedback highlights good people, though it also mentions rising prices and some professors lacking competence.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close