University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun - UMK vs University of Lodz - UL vs University of Gdańsk - UG vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 274 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education with knowledgeable and supportive professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life in a beautiful city.
- +Practical learning and career-focused programs.
- +Competent and supportive lecturers and staff
- +High-quality, practical education and training
- +Efficient university management and resources
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Vibrant community and ample opportunities
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Supportive and experienced professors
- +Abundant student activities and communities
- +Strong academic programs and practical application
- +Helpful, knowledgeable professors and opportunities for professional development.
- +Creative, flexible courses and space for self-expression.
- +Modern campus with collaborative study spaces.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content, especially for English Philology majors.
- -Lack of promised opportunities outside of specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Disorganized class schedules and perceived unnecessary content.
- -Administrative and management issues impacting educational development.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, particularly in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support in task completion.
- -Limited career opportunities and reliance on connections for jobs.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program quality and perceived lack of learning.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The university excels in **Location**, receiving its highest score, suggesting it's a significant draw. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating this area could be improved. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality also maintain solid, above-average evaluations.
Overall, the university scores well across multiple facets. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, with a rating of 4.28. Professors and student life also receive high marks, both above 4.1. The weakest area appears to be facilities, rated at 3.95, closely followed by value at 3.89, suggesting these could be opportunities for improvement.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This university garners strong reviews in key areas, with the highest marks awarded for Location (4.10) and Student Life (4.05). Professors also received favorable ratings at 4.07. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.73, followed closely by Value at 3.84 and Internationality at 3.89. Facilities rated well at 4.02.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its location, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Internationality also scores well at 4.2, alongside a robust student life at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, rated at 3.5, which is the lowest score. Facilities and professors both earned solid marks of 3.8, contributing to an overall favorable impression, with value sitting at a respectable 3.9.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its internationality, scoring a high 4.17. Location also received a solid 4. Areas for improvement are accommodation, with the lowest rating of 2.6, and facilities and value, both scoring 3.33. Professors and student life are rated moderately well, at 3.83 and 3.5 respectively.
University of Wrocław reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.36/5 based on 75 submissions. Students praise high-quality education, experienced professors, modern facilities, and a welcoming international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) cites program structure and perceived lack of opportunities.
All 19 reviews are positive, with students highlighting well-trained staff, competent lecturers, and a pleasant learning atmosphere. Some mention technical issues, but this is a minor recurring theme.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
A vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting warm and helpful staff, practical and engaging classes, and a welcoming environment. A very small percentage of feedback mentioned low organization and system limitations.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting qualified and passionate professors, numerous student activities, and a pleasant atmosphere. ~20% mention outdated equipment and a lack of guidance or opportunities for development.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, highlighting helpful professors and professional development opportunities. Some feedback (~17%) notes difficulties with communication and administrative processes.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
The best part of my college experience is that everyone feels welcome and does their best to help. The teachings are at a very high level. It's very difficult to learn when using English as a second language, but I've learned a lot and expected it. The Clinical Skills Suite is comparable to other universities, which is why I was convinced that I would choose cm umk as my chosen university. The laboratory is also well equipped and all procedures are very strictly adhered to for our own safety. The campus is in the middle of town with easy access to grocery stores and nearby coffee shops. The city's campus is close to most dormitories, saving you money on public transport. The campus has a modern design, but more importantly, it is kept to a high standard and very clean 24 hours a day. Much effort has been put into keeping it clean, which shows it. It feels like a house away from home. Student unions are great and student life is very personal to everyone, but I have to say that the experience and life of the entire university is a place where the best memories can be made. The only thing I wasn't very happy with was the student support. It would be very helpful if someone could introduce me to writing essays, case scenario essays, reflections, and other scientific research face-to-face.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
The university is well organised and both professors and staff are helpful and friendly. The university is located in northern part of Poland. Which is near to the sea. The city is very beautiful. But some polish people don’t like foreigners.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
