Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP vs Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP: wins 6/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Escuela Nacional Superior de Arte Dramatico: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
3.00
4.67
Not rated
3.67
4.40
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
3.67
4.17
Not rated
4.43
4.70
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.33
4.50
Not rated
4.38
4.60
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
3.67
5.00
Not rated
4.00
4.60
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
3.67
4.50
Not rated
4.50
3.90
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.00
3.90
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
2.67
4.00
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
  • +Strong focus on professional and personal development
  • +Positive peer relationships
  • +University prestige and academic rigor
  • +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
  • +Accessibility and good teachers
  • +Strong international focus and global opportunities
  • +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
  • +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Career-focused curriculum and expert instructors
  • +Professional and personal growth opportunities
  • +Diverse programs and cultural immersion
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities and technology
  • -lack of support and communication
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.

Nothing to show

  • -Financial burden of tuition fees.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.

This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.

This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, both receiving high scores. Internationality and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and facilities present areas for improvement, indicating these aspects are less favorably perceived by students. Overall, the institution appears to offer a positive experience, with specific categories requiring more attention.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of students praise diverse courses, excellent teachers, and strong career preparation. One review (~11%) mentions high tuition costs.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
25%
89%
0%
56%
60%
0%
4★
0%
75%
11%
0%
22%
40%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close