Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - PUCP vs Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB vs Universidad de Lima
Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
- +Strong focus on professional and personal development
- +Positive peer relationships
- +University prestige and academic rigor
- +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessibility and good teachers
- +Rich cultural environment and diverse activities
- +High quality of education and challenging academic programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and resources
- +Competitive and improving curriculum
- +Affordable tuition for medical studies
- +Expert, professional, and passionate professors
- +Practical and multidisciplinary coursework
- +Good infrastructure and vibrant student atmosphere
- +Quality education & skill development
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Dedicated and skilled professors
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and technology
- -lack of support and communication
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and poor communication negatively impact student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.
This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.
This institution boasts excellent ratings, particularly in its **professors** (4.75) and **student life** (4.5), alongside strong scores for **internationality** and **value** (both 4.5). Facilities also receive a positive mark at 4.25. The primary area for improvement, however, lies with **accommodation**, scoring a lower 3, and **location** at 3.75.
Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniformly neutral ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent scoring suggests an average or unremarkable performance across every aspect evaluated.
The university demonstrates a robust performance, with particular strengths noted in Location (4.7) and Professors (4.63). Areas such as Facilities and Value also receive favorable marks. Student Life and Accommodations are generally well-regarded. The lowest score is observed in Internationality (3.63), indicating this as a potential area for improvement.
This institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning impressive scores of 4.8 and 4.9 respectively. Conversely, its **Location** and **Student Life** present areas for development, with ratings of 2.9 and 2.8. The university also received solid, albeit less outstanding, marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors** (3.6), and **Accomodation** (2.8).
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.
Students praise the university's cultural richness, educational excellence, and diverse resources. The demanding curriculum is noted, fostering resilience. Some highlight the beautiful campus and ample student spaces.
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The positive review highlights a competitive curriculum and feasible pricing for medicine, while suggesting improvements in infrastructure.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 11 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include the quality and practical knowledge of professors, a strong academic foundation, and a good university atmosphere.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights prestigious education, skill development, and supportive professors. No negative feedback was reported.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I graduated from the Law program at Universidad de Lima four years ago, and my experience there was outstanding. This university offers a strong academic foundation, excellent facilities, and a vibrant student life. What stood out the most to me was the quality of the professors—many of them are respected professionals in the legal field, bringing real-world experience into the classroom. Their teaching methods were engaging and practical, which helped me develop not only theoretical knowledge but also essential skills for my career. The campus is modern, well-maintained, and equipped with everything students need—from a great library and study spaces to green areas that make it easy to take a break between classes. The university also fosters networking opportunities, both through career fairs and events where professionals come to speak about the industry. One of the few downsides was that some administrative processes could be slow or bureaucratic, but nothing too problematic. The university is quite demanding, especially in programs like Law, so students should be prepared for a challenging academic experience. However, if you are willing to put in the work, the rewards are worth it. Would I recommend it? Absolutely. If you are looking for a university that balances high-quality education, strong industry connections, and an excellent campus environment, Universidad de Lima is one of the best options in Peru.
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) is a very prestigious university in Peru, since it provides a quality education for all, provides opportunities for all to develop their skills and abilities for their professional life, It provides a pleasant environment to study and dialogue with our colleagues and above all they have professors with vocation. Personally, I am very grateful for the quality teaching that they offer me, since I have been able to develop my potential, abilities, skills and discover hidden talents, which I am very grateful. I recommend everyone to study at this university, as they will obtain a quality education that will be meaningful learning for their professional lives.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
