Nazarbayev University - NU vs Yessenov University vs University of Moncton - UM vs College of Health Technology - COHTECH vs Jakarta State University

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Nazarbayev University - NU: wins 0/2 categories
Yessenov University: wins 0/2 categories
University of Moncton - UM: wins 0/2 categories
College of Health Technology - COHTECH: wins 0/2 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 0/2 categories
Government Post Graduate College Dharmshala: wins 0/2 categories
Polytechnique Montréal: wins 2/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry
Aktau, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration Management and Marketing
Best programme: Community Health
Best programme: Food Industry
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.59
Not rated
4.25
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.97
Not rated
4.75
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.45
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.36
Not rated
4.75
4.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.58
Not rated
4.25
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.52
Not rated
4.25
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.63
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
  • +Supportive and expert faculty
  • +Enriching campus life and culture

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors with real-world experience
  • +Welcoming and diverse campus environment with ample student opportunities
  • +Accessible location and manageable class sizes fostering connections
  • +Engaging learning activities, positive environment, and excellent lectures.
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Expert and dedicated professors
  • +Vibrant student life
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are sometimes inadequate.
  • -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods are a recurring concern.
  • -The institution suffers from poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication leads to unmet student expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.

Nothing to show

A well-rounded academic institution, this university garners excellent scores, particularly excelling in **location** and **internationality**, both receiving an outstanding 4.75. The university also boasts strong ratings for its facilities, student life, and value, all at 4.25. Professors and accommodation are rated a solid 4. While no areas are significantly weak, professors and accommodation are the comparatively lower-scoring aspects.

This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in its Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated at 4. Internationality is similarly strong with a score of 4. The weakest area, though still a strong score, is Facilities at 4.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value were all rated a maximum of 5 out of 5. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in every area evaluated, with no particular category standing out as weaker than others given the uniformly high marks.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.

Nothing to show

With 3 out of 4 reviews being positive (~75%), students highlight thorough, interesting courses with knowledgeable instructors and a positive campus experience, including good diversity and welcoming atmosphere. The small class sizes and convenient campus location are also appreciated.

With one review received, the university earns a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review was positive, highlighting great learning activities, environment, and lectures.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise competent professors and a vibrant student life. No negative reviews were submitted.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
0%
25%
100%
67%
0%
100%
4★
51%
0%
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
3%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Master of Public Administration

I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close