Universidade Católica Portuguesa – Porto vs Nova School of Business and Economics vs Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - ISMT vs Coimbra Business School - ISCAC vs Coimbra Superior School of Education - ESEC

Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Coimbra - ISEC (4.70)
Universidade Católica Portuguesa – Porto: wins 1/6 categories
Nova School of Business and Economics: wins 2/6 categories
Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - ISMT: wins 0/6 categories
Coimbra Business School - ISCAC: wins 1/6 categories
Coimbra Superior School of Education - ESEC: wins 1/6 categories
Coimbra Health School - ESTeSC: wins 1/6 categories
Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Coimbra - ISEC: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Cinema
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Computational Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.27
4.51
Win
3.00
4.40
4.50
4.50
4.00
Location
4.43
4.09
4.00
4.40
4.75
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.53
4.29
4.00
4.60
Win
4.50
4.50
3.67
Internationality
4.37
4.58
Win
3.00
4.40
4.25
4.00
4.00
Student life
4.23
4.14
4.00
4.80
5.00
Win
4.50
4.33
Value
4.64
Win
4.36
3.00
4.60
4.50
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.79
3.60
4.00
4.20
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong career preparation and practice-oriented learning
  • +Welcoming and supportive academic and peer community
  • +Excellent and well-equipped research facilities
  • +High-quality, caring professors and practical, rigorous academics
  • +Strong international focus and global orientation
  • +Modern campus infrastructure and engaging, hands-on learning

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive and wide-ranging course content
  • +Supportive and available professors
  • +Strong academic atmosphere and community
  • +Engaging curriculum with practical application
  • +Supportive professors and personalized follow-up
  • +Diverse program options and future career preparation
  • +Strong career and international opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning experiences
  • +Practical, broad, and well-selected programs
  • +Helpful professors and engaging people
  • +Good campus facilities and location
Cons
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance of course content.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues regarding grading transparency.
  • -Poor internal organization and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated or impractical course content and teaching methods.
  • -Overcrowding and lack of study spaces on campus.

Nothing to show

  • -Poorly managed administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and unsupportive staff create difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is common.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently criticized for being irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates notable strengths in Value, with a score of 4.64, and Professors, rated at 4.53. Location and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, Accommodations appear to be the weakest area, scoring 3.79. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its generally positive standing.

This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, notably **Internationality** (4.58) and **Facilities** (4.51), indicating a well-resourced and globally connected environment. **Professors** (4.29) and **Value** (4.36) also score very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.60, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback across most metrics, with student life standing out as its strongest area at 4.8. Facilities and location also received high marks (4.4), alongside internationality (4.4) and professors (4.6). Value for money is also rated favorably at 4.6. Accommodation appears to be the relative weakest point, though still rated well at 4.2.

Student feedback indicates a particularly strong student life experience, earning a perfect score. The university also excels in its location and the quality of its facilities and professors. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating, though it still remains a positive score. Internationality also scores well, reflecting a good global outlook.

Consistently strong across most metrics, this institution boasts near-perfect scores for its exceptional location and impressive facilities. Professors and student life also receive very high marks. While student accommodation and overall value are highly rated, internationality stands out as the area with the most room for improvement, though still a solid rating.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with an exceptional rating for its location. Student life is also highly regarded, alongside solid scores for facilities, accommodation, and internationality. However, the assessment reveals that professors represent the weakest area, receiving a comparatively lower score. Overall, the university presents a positive picture, particularly in its environment and student engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

93% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent career opportunities, supportive professors, and practice-oriented courses. Modern facilities and a welcoming atmosphere are also frequently praised. A small amount of feedback notes disappointment with course content and exam transparency.

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting qualified professors, an international environment, and practical, rigorous programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor organization and too many students.

Nothing to show

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Students highlight comprehensive courses, excellent professors, and a strong academic atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

With 100% positive feedback from four reviews, students highlight strong programs, engaging curricula, and dedicated professors. The university is recommended for its professional and practical approach, with special mention of sports and internship opportunities.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent job opportunities and useful programs, including international connections. Some modules were noted as less professionally relevant.

With a 4.67/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical learning, helpful professors, and good facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
65%
53%
0%
60%
50%
50%
67%
4★
28%
40%
0%
40%
50%
50%
33%
3★
3%
4%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Sounds an Image - pomising yet incomplete course

Sound an Image is one of the 3 programmes from the School of the Arts. It is also, in my experience, the most neglected. This came in the form of less equipment available (priority given to the Cinema course), abysmal workshop conditions (very little space, missing or broken equipment) and not even a designated space where the Year 3 students could storage their Final Project material (I had to constantly fix or rebuild some of my materials). The curriculum itself is very good. Sound an Image is not a full on technical course, and the theoretical classes do help in developing an artistic sensibility and vision - the professors are also, for the most part, engaged and helpful. Lastly, we may have the poorest Student Association in Porto - low budget and little freedom. It's important to note that the programme has changed a lot along the years, recently going through changes on a yearly basis. Allegedly, upcoming students will have better conditions and equipment, as well as more practical projects. Closing remarks: in all honesty, I wouldn't go here without at least a half scholarship. I do not feel the full tuition matches the value of the course. However, Católica is more than a single programme. There's a lot of talks with speakers from different areas, from artists to cientists and other professional backgrounds. There's a psychology service with different workshops. There's a weekly cinema session organized by the Cinema students. There's all these extracurricular things that do bring their value to the school.

Amazing experience

Nova’s MSc in Finance is the best program in Portugal. The quality of the professors is notable, they are very approachable. Career opportunities are broad and limitless. The school’s campus is super modern, with many spots to study and to chill. It is located right next to the beach, which allows you to go for nice walks, surf sessions, and so on, to keep your work-life balance. Your peers will be highly motivated and highly skilled individuals, which creates the perfect environment for a great learning experience. Having that said, Nova is by far one of the best choices you can make.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close