Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA vs Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito (4.70)
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 2/7 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 2/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
5.00
Win
3.50
4.88
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Location
4.80
Win
4.50
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.60
4.50
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
4.40
Win
2.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Student life
4.40
4.50
Win
4.00
4.38
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Value
4.60
5.00
Win
4.00
4.75
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.29
Win
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
67%
33%
50%
0%
33%
0%
4★
40%
33%
67%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close