Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Fundación Universidad de América

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC (4.90)
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 2/3 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 0/3 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/3 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 0/3 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 1/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
5.00
4.17
4.00
1.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.50
3.67
5.00
1.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.67
Win
4.50
4.00
4.00
1.00
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
Win
2.00
2.71
3.00
1.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.20
4.50
4.00
4.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.17
5.00
4.57
5.00
1.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.20
5.00
1.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
67%
38%
0%
0%
33%
0%
4★
14%
33%
25%
100%
50%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close