Foundation University Islamabad - FUI vs Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC vs National University of Modern Languages vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST vs Hazara University

Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE (5.00)
Foundation University Islamabad - FUI: wins 0/7 categories
Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Modern Languages: wins 3/7 categories
Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST: wins 0/7 categories
Hazara University: wins 1/7 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 3/7 categories
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communications and Media Studies
Best programme: English Literature and Linguistics
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
4.08
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.17
Not rated
4.83
Win
3.17
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.83
Not rated
4.42
4.17
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
4.23
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.28
3.83
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
3.50
Not rated
4.42
3.83
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
3.92
Win
3.17
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty support and professional guidance
  • +Strong personal and ethical development alongside academic learning
  • +Relevant and impactful program content for career readiness

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality faculty and teaching methods
  • +Strong academic programs with relevant and up-to-date content
  • +Supportive learning environment and flexible schedules
  • +Academic quality and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse, accredited programs and flexible learning
  • +Scholarships and valuable soft skills development
  • +Good teachers and teaching quality.
  • +Positive learning environment.
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor communication and support from administrative staff.
  • -Outdated teaching materials and inadequate classroom technology.
  • -Lack of career services and limited job placement opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Unfair grading, favoritism, and unprofessional/rude teacher and staff conduct.
  • -Lack of transparency in internal evaluations.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in its academic offerings, with a standout rating for professors. Conversely, facilities and accommodation represent areas for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated positively, while location and value fall in the mid-range. Overall, the university demonstrates a commitment to teaching excellence alongside some opportunities for development in its physical resources.

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in **location**, receiving the highest score. **Professors** and **value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting areas for potential improvement within student living arrangements. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with a few standout strengths.

This institution presents a generally positive profile with notable strengths in its facilities and professors, both receiving ratings of 4 and above. Student life and value also score well. Conversely, location and accommodation appear to be areas for improvement, with the lowest ratings. Internationality is moderately rated.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Student life and professor quality both achieved an impressive 4.5, indicating a vibrant campus and excellent academic staff. Facilities and internationality also received solid ratings of 4. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.5, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its academic and social offerings.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, student feedback is ~67% positive. Reviews praise ethical education and skilled faculty who are supportive and understanding. Some mention outdated course content as a minor concern.

Nothing to show

University reviews are predominantly positive (~96%), highlighting knowledgeable faculty, high-quality education, and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~4%) expressed concerns about biased grading and unprofessional staff behavior.

With a 4.83/5 average from 6 reviews, ~0% negative feedback is noted. Students praise modern facilities, flexible options, and accredited programs. Academic strength, supportive faculty, and scholarships are frequently highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good teaching and a positive university experience.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
83%
50%
100%
0%
4★
17%
0%
46%
17%
50%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A good university

This institution focuses not only on course books education but also on ethical and moral education as well. After graduating not only you get degree but also you gain knowledge about yourself to become better citizen and human. Definitely recommended.

Nothing to show

NUML

Numl is one of the best universities in Pakistan. Numl is also internationally recognised. It provides quality education and great sports, library, and scholarship facilities to its students. NUML has good faculty and administration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close