New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University of Medicine Tirana vs University Marin Barleti - UMB vs Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/5 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 0/5 categories
University of Medicine Tirana: wins 0/5 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 1/5 categories
Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT: wins 0/5 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 4/5 categories
Polis University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Tirana, Albania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.00
5.00
3.67
5.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.33
3.80
4.00
3.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.67
3.82
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.67
3.09
4.50
3.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.00
3.36
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.67
3.64
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
2.91
4.50
Win
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Excellent professors and thorough medical programs
  • +Low tuition fees and scholarship opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on theoretical and practical learning
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and quality of teaching
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Good campus environment and facilities
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Lack of practical application and patient interaction in curriculum.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of practical materials and hands-on learning opportunities.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professor quality and location, both scoring well above average. Student life and value also received favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent areas for potential improvement, with lower scores in these categories. Internationality sits near the middle of the spectrum.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in the "Value" category with a rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0. Conversely, "Location" and "Internationality" received the lowest scores, both at 3.17. Facilities and Accommodation scored moderately well at 3.67, with Student Life closely behind at 3.5.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good medical programs, dedicated professors, and thorough teaching. A small portion, ~9%, expresses concerns about a lack of practical experience and outdated materials.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

Most students (~83%) praise practical learning, good teachers, and facilities. Some (~17%) report disappointment with practical resources.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
9%
50%
17%
100%
0%
4★
100%
100%
64%
50%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close