New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/7 categories
Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 0/7 categories
University College of Beder: wins 1/7 categories
Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT: wins 0/7 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.67
4.33
3.67
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
2.00
4.20
4.33
4.67
3.17
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.14
4.67
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.57
4.67
4.33
3.17
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
2.00
2.50
4.00
4.67
3.50
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.29
4.67
4.67
4.33
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.17
4.00
4.33
Win
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic staff and quality of education
  • +Practical, well-equipped labs and strong technical programs
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and a rewarding experience
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and quality of teaching
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Good campus environment and facilities
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, with a lack of consideration for student opinions and an unsupportive staff attitude.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disorganized class structures.
  • -Insufficient facilities and equipment, particularly lacking for practical subjects.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Lack of practical materials and hands-on learning opportunities.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a mixed review based on student feedback. Its strongest areas include Location, which received a high rating, and Value, indicating good return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be a significant weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life and Internationality also received comparatively lower marks, while Facilities and Professors fall in the mid-range.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in the "Value" category with a rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0. Conversely, "Location" and "Internationality" received the lowest scores, both at 3.17. Facilities and Accommodation scored moderately well at 3.67, with Student Life closely behind at 3.5.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.43/5, roughly 74% of students offer positive feedback, highlighting strong academic foundations, knowledgeable staff, and practical programs. However, approximately 28.6% of reviews note issues with administration, outdated facilities, and unsupportive staff.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

Most students (~83%) praise practical learning, good teachers, and facilities. Some (~17%) report disappointment with practical resources.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
29%
0%
67%
17%
100%
4★
100%
0%
14%
100%
33%
67%
0%
3★
0%
100%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Supportive professors and practical learning

he Polytechnic University of Tirana provides a solid foundation in technical and engineering fields. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the study programs are practical. However, the administration can sometimes be slow, and more modern facilities would improve the student experience. Overall, I would recommend this university to students who want a strong academic background.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close