New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University of Medicine Tirana vs University Marin Barleti - UMB vs University of arts Tirana - UART

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/4 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/4 categories
University of Medicine Tirana: wins 0/4 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 0/4 categories
University of arts Tirana - UART: wins 3/4 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 0/4 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Sculpture
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.00
5.00
4.00
3.50
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.33
3.80
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
Professors
Not rated
4.67
3.82
5.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.09
4.50
4.00
4.50
4.50
Student life
Not rated
4.00
3.36
4.00
5.00
Win
3.75
4.00
Value
Not rated
4.67
3.64
4.50
5.00
3.75
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
2.91
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Excellent professors and thorough medical programs
  • +Low tuition fees and scholarship opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on theoretical and practical learning
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +Supportive teachers and new opportunities
  • +Innovative programs and international experiences
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Lack of practical application and patient interaction in curriculum.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear expectations and communication lead to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professor quality and location, both scoring well above average. Student life and value also received favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent areas for potential improvement, with lower scores in these categories. Internationality sits near the middle of the spectrum.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, rated highly at four out of five. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its weakest area still being a positive score.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good medical programs, dedicated professors, and thorough teaching. A small portion, ~9%, expresses concerns about a lack of practical experience and outdated materials.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

The sole review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The reviewer highlights excellent opportunities for artistic expression, supportive and approachable teachers, and recent innovations like Erasmus programs.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
9%
50%
100%
50%
100%
4★
100%
100%
64%
50%
0%
25%
0%
3★
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close