New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of Tirana - UT vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of Medicine Tirana vs The European University of Tirana - UET

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The European University of Tirana - UET (4.30)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Tirana - UT: wins 0/6 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/6 categories
University of Medicine Tirana: wins 0/6 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 4/6 categories
Agricultural University of Tirana - UBT: wins 2/6 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.83
3.67
3.00
3.50
3.67
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.79
3.67
3.80
4.00
Win
3.17
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.58
3.67
3.82
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.67
3.33
3.09
4.50
Win
3.17
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.96
3.67
3.36
3.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.33
3.67
3.64
3.75
4.33
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.96
3.33
2.91
3.00
3.67
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff and faculty
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities
  • +Challenging and transformative academic experience
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Excellent professors and thorough medical programs
  • +Low tuition fees and scholarship opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on theoretical and practical learning
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Strong academic programs and quality of teaching
  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Good campus environment and facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and complaints are ignored.
  • -Teaching quality is poor with professors using their own books and neglecting important topics.
  • -Facilities are outdated and do not meet modern educational needs.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Lack of practical application and patient interaction in curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical materials and hands-on learning opportunities.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

With a nuanced performance across several key areas, this university's strengths lie in its **Location**, receiving a commendable 3.79. **Professors** also scored well at 3.58, alongside **Value** at 3.33. Conversely, the **Internationality** of the institution was rated lowest at 2.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life/Accomodation** were also areas needing improvement, both scoring below 3.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professor quality and location, both scoring well above average. Student life and value also received favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent areas for potential improvement, with lower scores in these categories. Internationality sits near the middle of the spectrum.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in the "Value" category with a rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0. Conversely, "Location" and "Internationality" received the lowest scores, both at 3.17. Facilities and Accommodation scored moderately well at 3.67, with Student Life closely behind at 3.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Approximately 37.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting welcoming faculty, organization, and quality learning. A small percentage (~4.2%) expresses dissatisfaction with grading and complaint procedures. The average rating is 3.42/5.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good medical programs, dedicated professors, and thorough teaching. A small portion, ~9%, expresses concerns about a lack of practical experience and outdated materials.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

Most students (~83%) praise practical learning, good teachers, and facilities. Some (~17%) report disappointment with practical resources.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
8%
67%
9%
50%
17%
0%
4★
100%
29%
0%
64%
25%
67%
0%
3★
0%
58%
0%
18%
25%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
17%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Staff and school quality

As a new student in UT Social Sciences, I can gladly say that I have felt very welcomed by the faculty since the first day I registered. I must say, everything is very well organized and the staff is very helpful with any questions that you might have. The campus is large with laboratories that ensure a high quality learning process.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close