New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce vs Aleksander Xhuvani Elbasan - UE vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University of Malta

Side-by-side comparison from 58 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Malta (4.10)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce: wins 0/7 categories
Aleksander Xhuvani Elbasan - UE: wins 0/7 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 3/7 categories
University of Malta: wins 4/7 categories
IADE Creative University - IADE: wins 0/7 categories
CMR Institute of Management Studies - CMRIMS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Adult Nursing
Best programme: Informatics
4.10
Top
Read more reviews
37 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
Best programme: Design
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
3.67
4.31
Win
3.42
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
4.33
4.61
Win
4.17
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.67
Win
4.46
3.69
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
4.67
Win
4.22
3.46
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.08
Win
3.08
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
4.30
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.27
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Strong lecturers and well-structured lessons
  • +Excellent facilities and study spaces
  • +High-quality, European-standard academic environment
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Supportive and expert academic staff
  • +Excellent study environment and campus beauty
  • +Strong administrative and personal student support
  • +Inspiring and creative learning environment with practical, project-based education
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty bringing real-world insights
  • +Modern facilities and active student life promoting personal growth

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -The curriculum often feels irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and uninspiring course content are disliked.
  • -Lack of organization and poor event management.
  • -Apathetic and unhelpful professors, inadequate teaching, and self-teaching required.
  • -Unprofessional and rude faculty, and an inconsistent curriculum.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a varied rating profile. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving an excellent 4.25. The university also scores well in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both at 3.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** are its weakest points, both receiving a modest 3. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the middle at 3.25.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

A comprehensive review indicates a strong showing across most aspects of university life. The institution excels in **Location**, boasting the highest rating. **Professors** also receive commendation for their quality. **Student Life** emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still rated favorably. Other categories like Facilities, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all fall within a commendable range, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience.

This university scores highest for its excellent **Location**, with a rating of 4.17. **Professors** also receive positive marks at 3.69. The university's **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, both scoring a modest 3.08 and 3 respectively. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated moderately, falling between 3.4 and 3.5. Its **Value** is also rated at 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

Two out of four reviews were positive, praising good lecturers, combined theory and practice, and good facilities. The average rating is 3.5/5 stars.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

Students praise the university's supportive academic staff and enriching study environment, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Some mention research limitations but highlight excellent administrative support.

About 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring environments and creative learning. A smaller portion, around 15%, criticizes poor organization and lack of professor support.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
8%
0%
4★
100%
0%
50%
100%
84%
46%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
3%
31%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close