Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN vs Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR vs Qassim University vs State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR (4.60)
Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR: wins 0/6 categories
Qassim University: wins 0/6 categories
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN: wins 1/6 categories
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals: wins 1/6 categories
EDC Paris Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Arab Open University: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineer
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: petroleum refining and Petrochemical engineering
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.50
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.40
Win
Location
5.00
Win
4.88
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
4.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.56
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.80
Internationality
5.00
4.22
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Student life
4.00
4.44
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.40
Value
5.00
Win
4.44
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.40
Accommodation
3.00
4.33
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teachers and engaging learning opportunities.
  • +Diverse, high-quality academic programs and career opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and a strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Open, inclusive, and professional campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
  • +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
  • +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
  • +Excellent engineering programs and facilities
  • +Supportive administration and alumni network
  • +Good professors and grading practices

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
  • +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burden and poor management.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum structure lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors, location, internationality, and value. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. However, facilities and accommodation received more moderate ratings, suggesting these could be areas for potential improvement.

This academic institution garners praise across multiple facets, with exceptional marks for **location** (4.88) and **professors** (4.56). Student life and overall value also receive strong scores around 4.44. The weakest area identified is **facilities**, rated at 3.5. Other positive aspects include accommodations and internationality, both scoring above 4.2.

Nothing to show

With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its accommodations and international student experience, both receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and professors are also well-regarded, scoring 4. Student life and value are solid at 3 and 4 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest score of 2.5.

Nothing to show

Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university has a 4/5 average rating, with all feedback being positive. The single review highlights good teachers and learning opportunities. However, it also notes a recurring theme of dirty bathrooms.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.55/5. Students highlight excellent faculty, diverse programs, and a supportive environment for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.

With one positive review, students highlight good engineering programs, labs, and infrastructure. The average rating is 3.5/5 stars, with ~50% positive sentiment. Campus life was noted as a bit boring.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
4★
100%
50%
0%
100%
50%
0%
20%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
20%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close