Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON vs University of Bihać vs Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine vs Veer Narmad South Gujarat University vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON: wins 0/0 categories
University of Bihać: wins 0/0 categories
Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine: wins 0/0 categories
Veer Narmad South Gujarat University: wins 0/0 categories
Yogyakarta State University - UNY: wins 0/0 categories
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka - ICASL: wins 0/0 categories
RMIT Vietnam: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
4.60
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Business
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.97
Location
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
4.67
Internationality
3.00
3.50
Not rated
3.33
5.00
5.00
4.56
Student life
5.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.08
Value
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.33
5.00
5.00
4.69
Accommodation
5.00
3.50
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
5.00
3.94
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent staff and well-maintained facilities
  • +Opportunities for positive social connections
  • +Evolving and updated academic programs
  • +Excellent technical and professional programs
  • +Disappointing facilities for some faculties

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic environment and supportive faculty.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and diverse course offerings.
  • +Clear administrative structure and helpful divisions.
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Focus on in-demand professional skills
  • +Highly reputable accounting and finance qualification
  • +Strong parliamentary backing and recognition
  • +International learning environment and multiculturalism
  • +Practical, interactive learning and career-oriented education
  • +Strong industry connections and internship opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is noted.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive workload and lack of support
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and lack of clear communication
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Excessive administrative and bureaucratic processes.
  • -Poor quality instruction and lack of engaging teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in several key areas. Its Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional student experience in these aspects. Professors and Value are also rated positively. The weakest area is Internationality, scoring a 3 out of 5, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity.

This institution scores exceptionally well in location, receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, student life presents the lowest-rated aspect at 3. Other areas like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value are rated a solid 3.5, while professors are well-regarded with a 4-star average.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, particularly with its professors receiving an outstanding rating of 4.67. Furthermore, facilities, location, student life, and overall value are all rated highly at 4 or above. However, the accommodation score of 2.5 stands out as a significant area for improvement, alongside a moderate rating for internationality.

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.

Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, providing an outstanding experience for its students.

Across various aspects of student experience, this university demonstrates notable strengths. It achieved particularly high marks in Value (4.69) and Professors (4.67), indicating strong academic and financial offerings. Internationality also scored well at 4.56. The weakest area identified is Facilities, with a rating of 3.97, though other categories like Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a similar range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviews highlight great facilities and staff, with some suggestions for program updates to better prepare students for the real world.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. One review highlights strong faculty organization alongside notable issues with facilities at other departments.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting an enriching academic environment, supportive faculty, and strong infrastructure. Students appreciate the diverse courses and growing divisions that foster exploration and provide clear guidance for queries.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. This single review highlights it as the best accounting and finance knowledge provider in Sri Lanka.

All 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.61/5. Students highlight interactive learning, international environments, practical skills development, and strong industry connections. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
67%
100%
100%
61%
4★
50%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
39%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Big big big

If you read this, this is a signal for you to go to RMIT Mel. The school is so big lol. It will take 2 semesters to explore everything. Internet cafes, labs, exhibition areas, displays, virtual reality... Everything is there so go quickly. * food behind school is cheaper than outside. Near school there is fortune alleys which is also quite delicious

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close