Universidad EAFIT vs Corporación Universitaria Remington - UNIREMINGTON vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITM vs Escuela de Aviación - INEC

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad EAFIT (4.80)
Universidad EAFIT: wins 5/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Remington - UNIREMINGTON: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITM: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Aviación - INEC: wins 0/7 categories
University Institution Of Envigado: wins 0/7 categories
University Foundation María Cano: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Medellin, Colombia
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Administrative and Accounting Systems
Best programme: General Medicine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.89
Win
3.25
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.88
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.58
4.50
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Win
3.50
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.89
Win
4.75
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.42
4.25
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.77
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Career support and growth opportunities
  • +High-quality education with excellent teachers and facilities
  • +Adaptable methodology and innovative entrepreneurship focus
  • +Accessible and flexible education options
  • +High-quality academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Supportive environment and student benefits
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are recurring concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives commendable ratings across multiple facets. Its strengths lie particularly in Facilities and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.89. Location also ranks highly at 4.88. While Accommodation and Internationality are also strong, the Value for money is rated lowest among the surveyed areas, though still at a solid 4.42. Professors also received a good score of 4.58.

Student feedback highlights exceptional strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.75, and excellent professor quality at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, which received the lowest rating of 3.25, and accommodation and internationality, both scoring 3.5. Location and value also received solid marks.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5, university students overwhelmingly praise the institution. Recurring themes highlight excellent support, career opportunities, and high-quality education. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 5 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% positive sentiment). Students praise the theoretical-practical model, supportive faculty, and accessible education formats. Limited negative feedback exists.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
83%
40%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
13%
20%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
4%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close