University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca vs Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMF vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST vs Marwadi University - Marawadi vs Bogdan Voda University - UBV

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST (4.80)
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca: wins 2/4 categories
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMF: wins 0/4 categories
Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST: wins 0/4 categories
Marwadi University - Marawadi: wins 0/4 categories
Bogdan Voda University - UBV: wins 2/4 categories
Guildhall School of Music and Drama - GSMD: wins 0/4 categories
Shanto Mariam University of Creative Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Biotechnology
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
Win
3.33
3.80
4.29
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
2.80
3.57
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.33
4.00
4.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
4.00
3.20
4.14
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
5.00
3.60
4.29
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.67
4.00
3.60
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.33
Win
3.67
2.80
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong career preparation and skill development opportunities.
  • +Renowned reputation and good research facilities.
  • +Supportive learning environment with helpful staff.
  • +Quality professors and strong academic preparation.
  • +Practical learning experiences are highly valued.
  • +Positive learning environment and location.
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty.
  • +Valuable development of critical soft skills and personal confidence.
  • +Scholarships and diverse program offerings.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and research-focused learning
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Passionate professors and clear explanations
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Effort-based learning and supplemental resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative processes and unresponsive management.
  • -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create a difficult learning environment.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and irrelevant course material are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university scores exceptionally well, with perfect marks for Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodations are also highly rated at 4.33. Value stands out as another strength at 4.67. The weakest area, though still strong, is Facilities, Professors, and Accommodations, which all received a 4.33 rating.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in location and student life, both receiving perfect scores. Professors and internationality are also highly rated. However, facilities represent the weakest area, with a score of 3.33, followed by accommodation at 3.67. Overall, it presents a generally positive picture with significant room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

This university's ratings show a mixed performance. Academics and campus experience are notable strengths, with Professors receiving a high mark of 4 and Student Life scoring a respectable 3.6. However, the university faces challenges in its physical environment and student support, as indicated by lower scores for Location and Accommodation, both at 2.8. Internationality and Value are moderately rated.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors are rated exceptionally well, and the university also scores highly for its facilities, student life, and value. Accommodation and internationality are also positive aspects. However, the location received a comparatively lower rating.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **professors (5/5)** and **internationality (5/5)**, along with excellent **value (5/5)**. Facilities, location, and accommodation also receive solid ratings of 4/5. The area with the lowest score is **student life (3/5)**, suggesting room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong reputation, research, and career preparation. Some mention outdated teaching styles, but note recent improvements.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise good teachers, quality studies, and a smart student body. A minor point mentions high fees.

With a 4.8/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight strong academics and knowledgeable, supportive faculty. Scholarship opportunities are also a significant positive. No negative feedback was provided.

All seven reviews are positive, averaging 4.29 out of 5 stars. Students highlight supportive teachers, practical learning, and a lively, clean campus with opportunities for networking and research.

With an average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, this university garners highly positive reviews. Students praise the solid program foundation, passionate professors, and relevant curriculum. Practical work is available, encouraging self-driven skill development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
33%
80%
29%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
67%
20%
71%
100%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close