Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMF Grigore T. Popa vs American Public University System vs University of Perpetual Help - Perps vs Kohat University of Science and Technology - KUST vs University of Prince Mugrin - UPM

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: American Public University System (4.30)
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMF Grigore T. Popa: wins 0/6 categories
American Public University System: wins 5/6 categories
University of Perpetual Help - Perps : wins 0/6 categories
Kohat University of Science and Technology - KUST: wins 1/6 categories
University of Prince Mugrin - UPM: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Botany
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
5.00
Win
3.67
4.00
4.00
Location
3.33
5.00
3.00
3.50
5.00
Professors
3.67
3.67
4.00
4.50
Win
2.00
Internationality
3.67
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
1.00
Student life
3.67
5.00
Win
3.67
4.00
3.00
Value
3.67
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
5.00
Win
3.67
4.50
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Advanced technology and learning resources
  • +Dedicated faculty and student collaboration
  • +Strong focus on academic excellence
  • +Dedicated faculty and timely, detailed support.
  • +Quality courses with work-ready certifications and degree options.
  • +Flexible learning for busy lifestyles.
  • +Excellent medical program and on-campus hospital
  • +Safe and convenient campus with recreational facilities and dorms
  • +Accessible food options on campus
  • +Affordable education
  • +Platform for learning different skills and research

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues negatively impact the academic experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Unhealthy student culture prioritizes memorization over genuine understanding.
  • -Poor academic advising and lack of clear communication from staff create confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and a general lack of maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Limited and inconvenient course scheduling makes it difficult to manage academic and personal commitments.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Limited career services and job placement support are greatly disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hindered learning.
  • -Lack of engaging content and relevant learning materials was a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives solid evaluations across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas include Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all scoring 3.67. Facilities and Location also perform well, rated at 3.33. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive performance with notable strengths in academic and social engagement.

This institution receives exceptional ratings across several key areas, notably in its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. The area receiving the lowest score, though still respectable, is professors, with an average rating of 3.67.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its academic offerings, with professors receiving an excellent rating of 4 out of 5. Value for money is also highly regarded at the same score. Conversely, location and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Facilities, student life, and accommodation are rated competently, all at approximately 3.67.

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are its professors and accommodation, both receiving 4.5 out of 5. Facilities, student life, and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The location, however, stands out as a relatively weaker point with a rating of 3.5. Value for money is also rated favorably at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are mostly positive (~67%), with students highlighting recent technological improvements like iPads and free access to valuable educational apps. A smaller portion of feedback (~33%) points to structural and academic concerns, including a memorization-focused culture.

With a 4.33/5 average rating from three reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight dedicated teachers and high-quality, work-ready courses. Minor administrative struggles were noted in one review.

With only one positive review out of three, feedback indicates the university offers a good medical program and convenient campus facilities like an on-site hospital. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, the university is positively reviewed (~100% positive feedback). Students highlight affordable education and a platform for skill development and research.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
33%
33%
50%
0%
4★
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
67%
50%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close