London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Istituto Marangoni vs Richmond University vs Central Saint Martins - CSM vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Small class sizes and intimate learning environments
- +Challenging curriculum with opportunities for growth
- +Global recognition through dual US/UK degrees
- +Excellent facilities and workshop opportunities
- +Supportive services and challenging academic briefs
- +Diverse and enriching program options fostering creativity
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Flexible, self-paced learning
- +Helpful instructors and fast support
- +Relevant and high-quality course material
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Poor quality of education and irrelevant course content.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This university presents a strong overall profile, with exceptionally high marks in Internationality (4.71). Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life all receive commendations, generally scoring above 4. The weakest area noted is Accomodation, which, while still a decent rating, falls slightly below the others at 3.86. Value is rated a solid 4.
This institution garners exceptional ratings for its Facilities and Location, both scoring a perfect five. Student Life and Internationality also stand out with strong scores of 4.67 and 4.5, respectively. While Professors, Accommodations, and Value receive solid ratings of 4, these represent the areas with the most room for improvement compared to the university's other strengths.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
Six of seven reviews are positive, averaging 4.29/5 stars. Students highlight intimate classes, unique curricula, and dual UK/US degrees. One review expresses disappointment with educational caliber.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4–5 stars and an average rating of 4.75/5). Students praise supportive services, challenging tutors, and excellent facilities for practice and creativity. Some mention a desire for greater diversity among students and tutors, and a few noted potential issues with tutor-to-student ratios.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
QRichmond American University London offers a unique approach to business management education by combining a liberal arts foundation with a focus on international business practices. Its accreditation in both the UK and the US provides students with a globally recognized degree, which can be beneficial for those seeking international career opportunities. The only issue is their high fees.
I have been studying Graphic Communication Design for the past three years, beginning with the foundation course. While this program may not be the ideal choice for those solely focused on commercial design, it offers an incredibly diverse and enriching experience for anyone interested in the intersection of communication design with various other fields. The program excels in fostering creativity and encourages exploration in areas such as fine art, fashion, bio-design, and beyond. This interdisciplinary approach allows students to leverage their creative thinking and graphic communication skills to pursue virtually any direction they can imagine. The flexibility and breadth of the curriculum enable students to develop a unique and personalized skill set, preparing them for a wide range of career paths. Overall, this program is perfect for those looking to expand their horizons and apply their graphic communication design skills in innovative and unexpected ways. It provides a solid foundation for becoming a versatile and adaptable designer in today's ever-evolving creative landscape.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
