Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
- +Vibrant student community and campus culture
- +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
- +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
- +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
- +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance
Nothing to show
- +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
- +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Focus on in-demand professional skills
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and resources
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.
This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.
Nothing to show
Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show